User talk:Ввласенко

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ввласенко!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. If you have experience contributing to Wikipedia, we have information that you might find useful.

Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can see the files you have uploaded in your gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg Only upload freely licensed or public domain content. Fair use is not allowed on commons. If you're copying files from another Wikimedia project, use the CommonsHelper You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Simply use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Simply tag it as {{speedy|reason for deletion}}. For more information read the full deletion guidelines.

-- 14:31, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Ввласенко!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 23:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Вид на Шверинский собор с рыночной площади.jpg was uncategorized on 17 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 23:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Шверин. Парковая скульптура.jpg was uncategorized on 17 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 23:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Вид на Шверин с колокольни Собора.jpg was uncategorized on 17 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 23:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Шверин. Улочка.jpg was uncategorized on 17 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 23:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Шверин. Рыночная площадь, замок и озеро.jpg was uncategorized on 17 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 23:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Вид на северную часть Шверина.jpg was uncategorized on 17 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 23:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Шверин. Рыночная площадь утром.jpg was uncategorized on 17 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 23:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Спасибо

Здравствуйте. Спасибо за фотографии из Шверина! -- Niteshift (talk) 22:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Случайно увидел "Мекленбургскую неделю" и решил откликнуться. У меня есть и другие фото, в частности , памятника Фридриху и Столба Победы, но я не захотел противопоставлять уже выставленным. Если нужно, могу предложить. Ввласенко (talk) 05:37, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Hallo, ich hatte vor Jahren Russisch in der Schule, meine verbliebenen Kenntnisse darin sind aber eher schlecht. Benutze bitte den Google Translator falls es dir mit Deutsch genauso geht :-), du kannst auch ruhig in Russisch antworten.

Wenn du weitere Bilder von Schwerin und Mecklenburg-Vorpommern hast, lade sie ruhig hoch. Es macht nichts, wenn sie schon mehrfach vorhanden sind. Deine Bilder haben eine gute Qualität, ich sehe sie mir durch und ergänze bei Bedarf wieder die Beschreibung und die Kategorien. Viele Grüße -- Niteshift (talk) 08:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Приятно было получить Вашу оценку. Давайте общаться с помощью переводчика Google, потому что немецким я не владею. Несколько позднее я загружу еще несколько фото, которые сделал в Шверине. Я не считаю их шедеврами, поэтому можете выбрать на свой вкус, какие лучше оставить в галерее, а какие удалить. Выбор категорий оставляю на Ваше усмотрение. Других фото Померании у меня, к сожалению, нет, есть Любек, Берлин и Потсдам. С наилучшими пожеланиями Ввласенко (talk) 17:28, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

for your information

Hello, your photo File:Вид на Шверинский собор с рыночной площади.jpg is the picture of the week in the german Portal:Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Best wishes -- Niteshift (talk) 22:58, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the message. I want to note it is pleasant for me that the photo of Schwerin is the picture of the week. Best wishes -- Ввласенко (talk) 09:02, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Wow! Really nice ;) Greets, -- Niteshift (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Photo challenge Leaves

Hello Ввласенко,
I just had to remove your picture File:Wild grapes.JPG from the Photo challenge Leaves, as this challenge is limited to pictures taken since September 1, 2014 (all pictures from September, October and November 2014 are fine). I hope you have some taken this season you can submit to the challenge!
Best wishes, Anna reg (talk) 13:06, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Ilya Arkhipovich Vlasenko.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content. Fair use laws vary from country to country, and uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. Also, fair use is only applicable in a few limited contexts. The use of a media file in one context may be considered fair use, while the use of the same file in another context may constitute copyright violation. In particular, fair use does not extend to the collection and distribution of media files in a media database such as Commons. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally to projects which allow this.

 

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - February - Reflections

I removed File:The confluence of the rivers Vltava and Labe near Melnik castle, Czech Republic.JPG from the challenge as it was not uploaded in February 2016. -- Colin (talk) 22:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

O'K Ввласенко (talk) 22:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Вид на фабрику "Герой Труда" в освобожденном от немцев Добруше.Май 1944.jpeg

File:Вид на фабрику "Герой Труда" в освобожденном от немцев Добруше.Май 1944.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Krdbot 19:00, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Meeting on the Elbe. 1945. Maj. Gen. F.A. Keating Maj. Gen. V.A.Gorishnii.jpg

File:Meeting on the Elbe. 1945. Maj. Gen. F.A. Keating Maj. Gen. V.A.Gorishnii.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

85.140.4.91 15:47, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Bologna Panorama.jpg

Hi, you cannot just add an image as FP candidate, you need to create an own page for that as described here. Poco² 09:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Замок в Шверине. Вид с юго-востока.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 14:59, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Der Schweriner Dom St. Marien und St. Johannis. Sommer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! August. Ukraine.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:42, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Monument Bertha Klingberg. Schwerin, Deutschland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Henry the Lion Monument in front of the Dom. Schwerin, Germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. quite an interesting composition! --Hubertl 09:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Schweriner Schloss. 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:42, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Street in the old town. Schwerin, Germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:14, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Bologna Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View of Lisbon from the Chiado.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:48, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View of the Gendarmenmarkt and Deutscher Dom (German Cathedral) from the Top of Französischer Dom (French Cathedral).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:48, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Cabo da Roca - Cape Roca.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:51, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! St. Nicholas Cathedral at Dobrush Belarus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! The Union Flag on Victoria Tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments I'm not opposing to the tilt, that's fine, but a few steps to the right and the flagpole would not have been entangled in the tower. The crop is also unbalanced with too much space on the left and an cropped-off building on the right. Any chance of another version of this? W.carter 10:25, 30 July 2016 (UTC) Comment The flag should be close to the tower in according to the plan. Perhaps a more laconic version will look better. I present it.  DoneThank you.--Ввласенко 16:29, 30 July 2016 (UTC) This works much better with the flag plan, better balance. :) Thanks! Good quality. W.carter 19:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Summer Berlin, view from the Victory Column.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better. And EXIF data. --XRay 08:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Old pier in Honfleur, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Thank you!  Done. In reality, there are not everything was strictly vertical. Good quality. --Hubertl 07:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! A moment of silence.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments A little bit of motion blur on the flag, but overall a good photo since what matters is knife sharp. Please add a geo tag though. W.carter 19:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Church of San Domenico in Arezzo, Italy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments OK nfor me --Verum 15:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Red-light district of Amsterdam by day. 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:55, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Flowers on the main square of Cheb, Czech Republic.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments OK --Verum 18:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Diamond cutter. Amsterdam. 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:15, 6 August 2016 (UTC)  Comment It is a very good picture, but it needs much better categories, "Jewellery making" is too wide and in this case it may not even be accurate since diamond cutters also work on industrial diamonds. As soon as the cats are right, I'll change this to a great big support. W.carter 14:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC) Done --Ввласенко Great! Now people can find it and use it in articles on Wikipedia. That's what it's all about. :) W.carter 18:54, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Church of St. Augustine in Arezzo, Italy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Better now --Poco a poco 07:59, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Petrarca’s house and Pretoria in Arezzo, Italy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. A geo tag would be nice though. Please provide one. W.carter 08:55, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Chimera of Arezzo Copy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. A geo tag would be nice though. Please provide one. W.carter 08:55, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Theological debate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality, but please look at the categories I added to it and do similarly on your other pics. W.carter 08:38, 7 August 2016 (UTC) *  Comment this is for sure not a theological debate, they are discussing the size of watermelon, which must be purchased on the market for the afternoon snack --Hubertl 09:45, 7 August 2016 (UTC) Very true! A title change might be in order. W.carter 12:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)  Comment W.carter, thanks for categories, it is not my plus. Right, priests who belong to different religions can dispute even about the size of a watermelont, which must be purchased on the market --Ввласенко 07:06, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Painting of color Delft pottery. 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Done Maybe it was an inspiration. You are right, I fixed a bug  Comment Please check the categories again, if they show up red they don't exist and you need to locate better ones. In this case you have probably just called them the wrong thing like "Dutch pottery" instead of "Ceramics in the Netherlands". W.carter 14:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC) QI to me now, just imporve the cats, please, W.carter is right Poco a poco 17:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC) Done Thank you--Ввласенко You missed a couple, now added, check those and you'll see how you could think. QI. W.carter 08:48, 7 August 2016 (UTC) I selected this one--Ввласенко 06:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Statue of Ferdinando I de' Medici in Arezzo, Italy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Statue nice and sharp and well contrasted against the building, but there are som white dust spots (?) in the sky. Think you could fix those? A geo tag would also be nice. W.carter 08:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)  Done Maybe it was oil, standard defect Nik610. Thank you. But if the town is indicated why we need geo tag?--Ввласенко 07:15, 7 August 2016 (UTC) Thanks! The town is not enough, the tag is to show exactly where the photo was taken. The tags are coordinated with OpenStreetMap and Google Earth. Look at this file and click on things at "Camera location" and you will see how it works and how to write the tag. W.carter 10:34, 7 August 2016 (UTC)  DoneThanks! --Ввласенко Very nice! QI. W.carter 17:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Monument to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe in Františkovy Lázně, Czech Republic.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good compisition, really lousy categories and no geo tag. Please fix that, it is part of what a QI is all about. W.carter 10:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC) Done Thank you --Ввласенко 12:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC) Thanks, although I changed the "Poets from Germany" to "Monuments and memorials to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe" which is a sub-category of the one dedicated to him. Take a look and you will see. Good quality. W.carter 13:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC) O'k--Ввласенко 08:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Monument to Franz Joseph I of Austria in Františkovy Lázně, Czech Republic.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Done Thank you --Ввласенко 06:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC) I have reworked the categories, please, have a look. You should get down to the lowest category indicating what and where --Poco a poco 06:43, 12 August 2016 (UTC) O'k--Ввласенко 08:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pelophylax esculentus 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good photo, but needs much better description of where it was taken for the sake of habitat and species variation. A geo tag would be perfect. W.carter 09:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC)  Done Thank you --Ввласенко 10:29, 13 August 2016 (UTC) Great! Now it can be compared with specimens of the same species in other parts of the world, that's why it's important. QI. W.carter 13:35, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Tour Montparnasse seen from Arc de Triomphe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. W.carter 08:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! A modern sculpture near Church of St. Augustine in Arezzo, Italy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Needs much better categories. W.carter 08:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)  Done --Ввласенко 10:10, 13 August 2016 (UTC) Ok, nice try, you are getting closer. ;) I corrected the last bit, take a look now. When you find a category, see if one of the sub-categories fits better and keep digging as far as you can, that is how you locate the right category. QI W.carter 11:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)  Done Caught one yet! --Ввласенко 15:39, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Towers of the Schwerin Castle. Schwerin, Germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! The memorial in honor of the 60th Army (USSR) which liberated the village Yasnogorodka (Ukraine) in 1943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:50, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Mass grave soldiers which perished during the liberation of the village Yasnogorodka (Ukraine) in 1943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:05, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! A riverside of Dnieper near the village Yasnogorodka, Ukraine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Comment You should modify the categories (and create the missing ones). --XRay 04:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)  Comment I don't understand why the real categories are recognized as erroneous  Comment Please sign your comments. There are three red links, the categories should be created. And categories should be categorize the location and subject best possible. Please create missing categories. (The image itself is IMO QI, but for QI there are more requirements like categories, description, name and so on.) --XRay 07:24, 15 August 2016 (UTC)  Done--Ввласенко 07:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)  Support It's your solution. ;-) The categories are OK now, but prefer to create missing one not to remove them. --XRay 08:52, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 August 2016 (UTC)