Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 15 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Midnight sun over Inuvik from Dempster Highway.jpg[edit]

Midnight sun over Inuvik from Dempster Highway.jpg

  • Nomination The midnight sun from just south of Inuvik --Daniel Case 05:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline * Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Pudelek 10:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noisy and unsharp (I guess due to diffraction), many dust spots and even more lens flares. --C messier 12:41, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per C messier. Pity, 'cause it's a nice motìf.--Peulle 06:55, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Symbol declined.svg Declined   --Hubertl 06:38, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Aachen,_Dom_--_2016_--_2743.jpg[edit]

Aachen, Dom -- 2016 -- 2743.jpg

  • Nomination Cathedral in Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 15:28, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Top crop is too tight and the picture seems to be slightly leaning to the right. --Code 05:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
    • ✓ Fixed Sorry, you're right. It's better now, may be good enough. --XRay 15:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok for me now as it is. --Hubertl 02:13, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm agree with Code, sorry.--Lmbuga 12:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC).
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Bad picture--Lmbuga 17:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Bad? But you're right, it's not the best. --XRay 16:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Symbol declined.svg Declined   --Hubertl 18:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Bonn,_Beethoven-Denkmal_--_2016_--_4023.jpg[edit]

Bonn, Beethoven-Denkmal -- 2016 -- 4023.jpg

  • Nomination Beethoven memorial in Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 15:28, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn {{o}} Sorry, top crop is too tight, perspective problems (look at the church in the background). --Code 09:17, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
    ✓ Fixed I've made some improvements, hopefully it's good enough now. --XRay 16:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok. --Code 07:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unsharp at top and distracting background. --Smial 09:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Only a bit unsharp at the top. The composition is good to me. Maybe for Valued Image, the background would be disqualifying. -- Ikan Kekek 03:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, per Smial--Lmbuga 15:12, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support pretty difficult to get this from such a short distance. There is no chance to get it sharp all over. Therefore a weak support. --Hubertl 15:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Hubertl: Of course there is a chance to get it sharp all over. The foreground is acceptable sharp, the buildings and the crane in the far background are acceptable sharp, the head is not. So it is not a problem of DOF and short distance. This is in most cases a result of either a perspective correction (my guess) or a very bad lens (don't think so, even cheap kit lenses perform better). -- Smial 10:28, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sorry. This is one IMO of the worst possible pictures. It's incredible. Congratulations for the author: it's realy a bad picture--Lmbuga 17:15, 13 September 2016 (UTC). Pictogram voting comment.svg new comment --> Bad composition:too tight at top. Unfortunate light. Back of the sculpture. A lot of elemnts disturbing. The correction of the perspective distortion is a problem: bad horizontal perspective corrretion. Upper side of the statue is blurry. Edge of the upper side has a blue halo.... INCREDIBLE!!!--Lmbuga 17:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Español: Le agadecería al autor que retirase la foto porque la inconsistencia y falta de criterio de los usuarios es mucha--Lmbuga 17:57, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment (es:) ¿Quién realmente puede pensar que esta es una buena imagen. Una imagen digna de aparecer en la portada de una revista o un periódoco. Pensais que va a ser foto de la portada de Commons (Dios me valga: aún no pensamos en algo así como suicidarnos--Lmbuga 18:01, 13 September 2016 (UTC)). Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This has been my last review of this picture.Bat, if this photo is accepted, I do not paint anything (I know)--Lmbuga 18:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Smial and per Lmbuga to protect him from a heart attack. :-) --Basotxerri 20:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Tranqui, tronco :-) --Basotxerri 20:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Lmbuga, so dramatic! I hope you're staying away from all those sharp knives and open windows. This is not going to go on the front page of Commons; the only question is whether it's good enough for QI, not FP. You've made your case effectively. See what others think. -- Ikan Kekek 22:38, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Breaking the tie as there are clearly some issues which make a QI promotion problematic: the top of the statue is unsharp and there are perspective issues. P.S.: @Lmbuga:, please be polite when reviewing; your tone can be construed as offensive.--Peulle 08:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination May it is not the best, but IMO not bad. But I think I'll agree with Basotxerri, Ikan Kekek and Peulle. --XRay 16:08, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Symbol declined.svg Declined   --(Withdrawn) Jee 04:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)