User talk:Alvesgaspar
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
1 (2006-7), 2 (2007), 3, 4, 5, 6 (2008), 7, 8, 9, 10 (2009), 11, 12, 13, 14 (2010), 15, 16, 17, 18 (2011), 19, 20, 21, 22 (2012), 23, 24, 25, 26 (2013), 27, 28, 29, 30 (2014), 31, 32, 33, 34 (2015), 35, 36 (2016), 37, 38 |
Contents
- 1 Using_the_caliper_new.gif
- 2 Quality Image Promotion
- 3 FP Promotion
- 4 FP Promotion
- 5 Quality Image Promotion
- 6 FP Promotion
- 7 Quality Image Promotion
- 8 FP Promotion
- 9 Quality Image Promotion
- 10 Quality Image Promotion
- 11 Quality Image Promotion
- 12 Quality Image Promotion
- 13 Quality Image Promotion
- 14 Quality Image Promotion
- 15 Quality Image Promotion
- 16 FP Promotion
- 17 Quality Image Promotion
- 18 Quality Image Promotion
- 19 FP Promotion
- 20 Quality Image Promotion
- 21 Quality Image Promotion
- 22 Quality Image Promotion
- 23 Quality Image Promotion
- 24 Quality Image Promotion
- 25 Quality Image Promotion
- 26 Quality Image Promotion
- 27 FP Promotion
- 28 categories
- 29 Quality Image Promotion
- 30 FP Promotion
- 31 Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer
- 32 Quality Image Promotion
- 33 Quality Image Promotion
- 34 Quality Image Promotion
- 35 FP Promotion
- 36 Quality Image Promotion
- 37 Quality Image Promotion
- 38 Quality Image Promotion
- 39 Quality Image Promotion
- 40 Quality Image Promotion
- 41 FP Promotion
- 42 Quality Image Promotion
- 43 Quality Image Promotion
- 44 Notification about possible deletion
- 45 Quality Image Promotion
- 46 Quality Image Promotion
- 47 Quality Image Promotion
- 48 Quality Image Promotion
- 49 Quality Image Promotion
- 50 Quality Image Promotion
- 51 Happy holidays! 2017! ;)
- 52 Merry Christmas and Happy new year!
- 53 Quality Image Promotion
- 54 Moscow July 2011
- 55 Syrphid Flies poster
- 56 File source is not properly indicated: File:Eduardo Viana February 2015-1a.jpg
- 57 Chiesa_del_Ges%C3%B9_September_2015-1a
- 58 FP Promotion
- 59 Notification about possible deletion
- 60 FP Promotion
- 61 FP Promotion
- 62 Using the caliper new en.gif
- 63 Uso de imagem
- 64 Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th
- 65 Happy holidays! 2018! ;)
- 66 A barnstar for you!
- 67 uso de fotografia
Using_the_caliper_new.gif[edit]
Hi, please see discussion at File talk:Using the caliper new.gif#Teaching INCORRECT way to read the caliper. Cheers, Jason Quinn (talk) 13:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Library Congress October 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Capitol Washington October 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Support Good quality.-- |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Chicago September 2016-20.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chicago September 2016-20.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Library Congress October 2016-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Library Congress October 2016-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Washington October 2016-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Washington October 2016-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
The image File:Prague September 2016-2a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prague September 2016-2a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Library Congress October 2016-2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
The image File:Chicago September 2016-14.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chicago September 2016-14.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Our Lady before Tyn Prague September 2016-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Charles Bridge Prague September 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Porto Covo October 2016-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Old Town Hall Prague September 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Capitol Washington October 2016-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Done The image was denoised and the dust spots removed, thanks. Yes, this is a 100% jpeg.  |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Capitol Washington October 2016-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Library Congress October 2016-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Vitus Prague September 2016-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Vitus Prague September 2016-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Vitus Prague September 2016-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Barajas September 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Barajas September 2016-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! New Town Hall Prague September2016-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Bird Washington October 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Comment Please add more categories: where was it taken in Washington DC? -- |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
The image File:Stained-glass windows ST. Vitus 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stained-glass windows ST. Vitus 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Vitus Prague September 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Ignatius Prague September 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Vitus Prague September 2016-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Porto Covo October 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Our Lady before Tyn Prague September 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Wenceslaus Prague September 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Wenceslaus Prague September 2016-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
The image File:Barajas September 2016-5.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Barajas September 2016-5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-21a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-6a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! New Town Hall Prague September2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Reflextions Prague September 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Washington October 2016-7a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Washington October 2016-8a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Washington October 2016-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Library Congress October 2016-6a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Porto Covo October 2016-5a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Porto Covo October 2016-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Washington October 2016-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chicago September 2016-42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Chicago September 2016-23.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chicago September 2016-23.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
categories[edit]
Please do not do such eits again! "Paintings by XYZ in the Museum QWERTY" is logically already a sub of "Paintings by XYZ" and not to be added additionally. With such edits, you are violating the Commons policy on categories and it is also disrespectful for the work by your colleagues who want to help you, in case you still don't understand the category system. Consider this as an administrative warning. Thanks --A.Savin 23:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Paris July 2011-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Bremen October 2012-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Library Congress October 2016-5a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Chicago September 2016-37.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chicago September 2016-37.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer[edit]
Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.
Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:31, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Paris July 2011-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso September 2015-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Jan de Bray Washington October 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Ludolf Backhuysen Washington October 2016-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Agnolo Gadi Washington October 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Lucas Cranach Washington October 2016-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Manet Toreador Washington September 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Manet Washington September 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Van Honthorst Washington October 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Quentin Massys Washington October 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Marriage of Cana Washington Octber 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Cathedral Antwerp July 2015-15a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
The image File:Holy Kinship Washington October 2016-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Kinship Washington October 2016-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Van Honthorst Washington October 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Cezanne Washington October 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Renoir Washington September 2016-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Renoir Washington September 2016-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Clouet Washington October 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Saint Anne altarpiece Washington October 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-23a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Rembrandt Washington October 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-23a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Vitus Prague September 2016-24a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Jorge Colaço March 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Jorge Colaço March 2016-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Vitus Prague September 2016-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-30a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-34ajpg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Vitus Prague September 2016-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Tanzio da Varallo Washington Ocober 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Antwerp July 2015-6a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-31a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-34ajpg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
The image File:Prague September 2016-38a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prague September 2016-38a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Vitus Prague September 2016-30b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Vitus Prague September 2016-31a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Vitus Prague September 2016-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Lamp March 2016-1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Washington October 2016-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Washington October 2016-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Washington October 2016-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-39a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 23:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Bouro March 2016-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Expo 98 January 2016-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Ignatius Prague September 2016-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Ignatius Prague September 2016-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Ignatius Prague September 2016-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prague September 2016-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Squirrel Chicago October 2016-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Washington October 2016-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Capitol Washington October 2016-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! St Vitus Prague September 2016-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Lixus March 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Lixus March 2016-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Kali December 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Capitol Washington October 2016-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Cercal March 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Oxythyrea March 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Capitol Washington October 2016-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Library Congress October 2016-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Happy holidays! 2017! ;)[edit]
|
* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * * | |
| * Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:59, 24 December 2016 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas and Happy new year![edit]
|
|
English: Hellow Alvesgaspar, Merci/Gracias/Thanks my friend for do it posible, this family of Commons, beleave that we can change world improving the educational media disponible. Take care by your self --The Photographer 03:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
--The Photographer 03:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Lamps March 2016-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Moscow July 2011[edit]
[1] What's your problem, please? --A.Savin 13:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Savin,
There was a long (and hard) discussion some years ago about including the QI logo, as well as other pieces of information, into the Assessment template. No consensus was reached and most editors preferred to leave things as they were. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- My name is A.Savin, you know.
- What is your problem: the assessment template, or the POTD? You removed both. Please return the POTD if there are no concerns about that.
- --A.Savin 14:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- I know your name, Savin :) It is written in the first line of my reply! Sorry about removing the POTD template, it was not on purpose. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- If you want to provoke me, it is just silly and of course unbecoming of a gentleman.
- Fortunately, I don't have to do much with people like you.
- I really have no clue what have you been smoking, but I think the removal of the QI seal despite the fact that the picture passed the review, is unacceptable anyway. A QI, once promoted, is QI, unless there is real consensus for otherwise. I'm going to restore the seal.
- Have a nice day. --A.Savin 15:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not trying to provoke anybody and the removal of the two templates from the image file (QI and POTD) was an accident (which I fail to understand). Please restrain from unecessary aggressiveness. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Syrphid Flies poster[edit]
Hello Alvesgaspar - I just emailed you a question about your Syrphid Flies poster (January 2008) Have you ever written about it in any sort of detail? I did a search did not find anything. Thanks. GeeBee60 (talk) 17:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Eduardo Viana February 2015-1a.jpg[edit]
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Eduardo Viana February 2015-1a.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Eduardo Viana February 2015-1a.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:55, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Chiesa_del_Ges%C3%B9_September_2015-1a[edit]
Dear Alvesgaspar, I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chiesa_del_Ges%C3%B9_September_2015-1a.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com
hippofish 11:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Mustafa,
No problem in reproducing my images in Commons as long as credit is given. "Joaquim Alves Gaspar, Wikimedia Commons" is the right form. Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:42, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
The image File:Orthetrum August 2017-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Orthetrum August 2017-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Thesupermat (talk) 09:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
The image File:Berberomeloe majalis April 2017-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berberomeloe majalis April 2017-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Expo 98 January 2016-5.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Expo 98 January 2016-5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Using the caliper new en.gif[edit]
Courtesy notice of delist featured image discussion regarding File:Using the caliper new en.gif. Cheers, Jason Quinn (talk) 21:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Uso de imagem[edit]
Boa tarde, gostaria de usar algumas das suas imagens, será possível facultar-me um endereço de email ou um telefone para onde o possa contactar? Com os melhores cumprimentos, Ricardo Silva ADPM - Associação para a Defesa do Património de Mértola —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.154.193.210 (talk) 12:19, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Olá, pode usar qualquer das minhas imagens desde que sejam acompanhadas de informação sobre a sua autoria: "Joaquim Alves Gaspar, (data), Wikimedia Commons." -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:54, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th[edit]
|
It is a world event.
This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).
|
--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Happy holidays! 2018! ;)[edit]
|
|
* Happy Holidays 2018, Alvesgaspar! * | |
-- George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC) |
 |
Be ready, as it is time for celebration, New Year brings new hopes and aspiration, Have a fantastic year filled with peace and health, With lots of love and loads of wealth, Wishing you a happy new year! . --The Photographer 14:58, 28 December 2017 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Admin's Barnstar |
| You have been a great help to me when i was looking for pictures..Please continue your great work. Marconoplay242 (talk) 00:30, 31 May 2018 (UTC) |
uso de fotografia[edit]
Boa tarde, Trabalhamos a publicação do nosso prossimo libro universitario para uma pequena editora francêsa. Hà uma cita de Santa Cecilia de Stefano Maderno, e gostariamos, se posivel,de usar a sua fotografia. Se a resposta seria afirmativa, la teria em formato original, sem recortes (a sua, de formato panoramico, deixa imaginar um re-enquadre)?
Muito obrigada!
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Moscow_July_2011-4a.jpg&oldid=prev&diff=234584807){kind=link}
