User talk:Catfisheye

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Catfisheye!

Contents

TUSC token b7692b690e76afb858e3a481bf485d73[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Black Buffalo Tipi. 830.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Black Buffalo Tipi. 830.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--MGA73 (talk) 18:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Catfisheye!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Commons:File renaming User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands

Sommer[edit]

Ciao, purtroppo NON ho il catalogo di Sommer, in effetti mi ero messo a cercare di costruirlo io su WikiCommons. Per ora ho smesso perché non ho più (da quando ho cambiato casa) la connessione in fibra, ma solo una chiavetta con soli 100 Mb al giorno (troppo poco per i Gb di foto che caricavo in passato).

Purtroppo quelle foto io le prendevo da ebay, e mi basavo sulle dichiarazioni dei venditori: qui palesemente qualcuno ha fatto confusione. Ad ogni modo la risposta corretta è "Siena", come mostra questa foto: File:Battistero_siena_01.jpg. Grazie per il tuo lavoro di revisione e correzione. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 17:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Buonasera, ho visto la foto di Sommer di Piazza della Scala, dovrebbe correggere la didascalia non siamo agli inizi del '900 ma nel 1870 circa: è il periodo dell' inaugurazione del monumento a Leonardo. Inoltre la datazione è suffragata dal sistema di illuminazione della piazza, quel tipo di lampione era per l'illuminazione a gas(1855-1890ca), l'illuminazione elettrica a Milano iniziò nel 1883 con l'inaugurazione della stagione della Scala e, dopo il grande successo, il Comune appaltò alla Edison il servizio di illuminazione pubblica qui link a cartolina viaggiata nel 1906 http://i1053.photobucket.com/albums/s465/evaristo2000/PiazzaDellaScalaPrimi900-2.jpg ed un palo dell'illuminazione elettrica in primo piano sempre dei primi anni del '900 http://i1053.photobucket.com/albums/s465/evaristo2000/PzaDellaScalaPrimi900.jpg Ringrazio per l'attenzione Max

Please don't blank pages[edit]

Hi Catfisheye,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked File:Kusakabe Kimbei - 62. Vegetables.jpg on Commons. I asume you meant for the page to be deleted, but blanking the page is not the right way to do this. I'd like to strongly recommend to use {{speedy| type reason here }} and add it on top of the page you would like to have deleted; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regulary for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed. Thanks again. 23:05, 28 May 2010 (UTC)–Krinkletalk

Hello, I wanted to upload another file upon the same name, so there was no necessity (i guess) to ask a deletion. Regards. --Catfisheye (talk) 23:07, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, No problem but the assumption is wrong. The file and the page are two seperate ;-). By the way you also blanked Category:Jewish cemeteries in Niedersachsen today. Should it be deleted ? If so, write the {{speedy| type reason here }} code instead of blanking and it'll be deleted soon. –Krinkletalk 14:43, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Krinkle, I am sorry but I did not get the point, what do you mean with "The file and the page are two seperate", because I uploaded another file under the same name, so this has worked. Yeah, I want to have the cat deleted, but I did not find "nominate for deletion" in the tools and then I got a call. I'll mark the cat now. Thanks for your help. Regards --Catfisheye (talk) 14:55, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

File mover[edit]

The functionality of the template {{rename}} has recently changed. You might need to clear your cache to see the changes. If successful you should then be able to use the new "Quick adding" link in the template to instruct CommonsDelinker to replace the old name with the new name in all wikis. Please use that every time you rename a file. If further questions arise, feel free to write on my talk page --DieBuche (talk) 10:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Category:Painters from X[edit]

Catfisheye, I appreciate help with cleaning up Category:Painters from X. While cleaning that category I was usually trying to

  1. verify info in the creator page based on a wikipedia page or Google search. If Wikipedia page existed than add link to it, populate birth/death location and check Description field which was set by default to painter.
  2. search Commons for other images , creator pages or categories of the same creator. If there are other creator pages or categories than pick the one with the better name and leave redirect from the other. If there are any images than add them to the new category
  3. finally I would properly categorize the categories themselves and remove Category:Painters from X

I am not sure what was your process, but can you either try the same steps or let me know and I will do it. By the way there will be about 100 more categories like that tomorrow based on Category:Creator templates without key information. Greetings and thanks for help --Jarekt (talk) 20:53, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello, at least I will try to do so for the painters, I've already recategorized. Thanks. Regards --Catfisheye (talk) 21:27, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Kerk waar?[edit]

2005-05-01 18.24 Gereformeerde Kerk Varsseveld, gelegen in Sinderen.jpg

Hallo, je hebt de cat Sinderen erbij gezet. Staat die kerk echt in Sinderen, ken je die? --Ziko (talk) 22:08, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Ziko, zum Vergleich habe ich die gleiche Kirche als andere Version verlinkt. Da diese Kirche in der Kategorie Sinderen stand, habe ich das übernommen. Wenn dies fehlerhaft sein sollte, dann tut es mir leid. Liebe Grüße --Catfisheye (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2010 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Catfisheye. You have new messages at Martin H.'s talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wikilinks in categorie comuni[edit]

Ciao! Ho visto che hai aggiunto i links alla categoria di Malfa in altre lingue. Non preoccuparti, l'avrei fatto io stesso non appena finito di controllare tutte le altre categorie dei comuni. Idem per gli altri comuni. Dammi una decina di minuti! ;-) Ciao! -- Vonvikken (talk) 23:56, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

File missing[edit]

The file you tried to upload (File:Snacks_from_Thailand.jpg) is missing. - Takeaway (talk) 04:35, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for notifying me. I have the impression, that the flickr upload bot is out of order. So I'll try to do so later again. Regards Catfisheye (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup ![edit]

Thank you a lot for your fast answer, it solve my problem. By the way just few littles corrections : (traduit mot pour mot, je ne sais pas s'il éxiste existe (never é before x always e) un terme specifique spécifique here é.). But it's really nothing (writing french is awful for french themselves), I think you can really put fr-2 on your babel box Clin. Encore merci pour ton aide ! Vive la Rosière (talk) 17:27, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Churches in Belgium[edit]

It might be a good idea to read Category talk:Churches in Belgium and Category talk:Belgium before making structural changes. Best. --Foroa (talk) 05:38, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

I read that there was a decision some years ago. But when I started to sort the Cat Churches in Belgium had over 3.000 files and I did not want to create micro-cats for cities (like Churches in xyz), if we have only 3 files of this town, all of them depicting the churches. So sorry but I thought en:Wikipedia:Be bold applies here as well. regards Catfisheye (talk) 15:36, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
So you destroyed hours of work, without waiting for my answer. thanks a lot! Catfisheye (talk) 15:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

In application[edit]

As the creator of various "[Makeup] in application" categories, please see Category talk:Cosmetics application. - dcljr (talk) 13:55, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/07/Category:Chocolate syrup[edit]

Hi großer Fisch! :-) Falls du zu viel Zeit hast, kannst du mal schauen, ob du als Lebensmittelexpertin Rat weißt? Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/07/Category:Chocolate syrup Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Hallo großer Saibo! :) Mein Expertentum ist doch nur angefuttert, und nicht mal das sieht man. Mein Vorschlag wäre es, das alles unter liquid chocolate zu subsumieren, aber das klingt noch mehr nach TF. Sorry, echt keine AHnung. :( Hoffentlich das nächste Mal! Liebe Grüße Catfisheye (talk) 18:25, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Okay. Danke trotzdem. :-D Category:Melting_chocolate gibts auch - aber Soße ist ja was anderes als flüssige Schoko - denke ich ;). Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 19:39, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Alex_Ovechkin_-_1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Alex_Ovechkin_-_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Giorgio Sommer[edit]

Hallo Catfisheye. Herzlichen Dank fuer die schoenen Fotos von Giorgio Sommer die du geladen hast. Es waere aber wichtig dass du ihnen nicht nur die Author/Fotograph Kategorie gibst, sondern auch die entsprechende Ortschafts Kategorie. Es sind sehr schoene und interessante alte Fotos, die dann genau in ihrer Sujet Kategorie nicht vorkommen, wo sie eigentlich von den meisten Users gesucht werden. Was ich so gefunden habe, habe ich unterdessen saniert. Koenntest du bitte deine uploads sistematisch kontrollieren? Ich waere dir sehr dankbar! Alles Gute. --DenghiùComm (talk) 14:43, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Nein, ich kann nicht nach Haifa kommen. Meine Ferien sind leider schon zu Ende ! Buon lavoro a Haifa ! --DenghiùComm (talk) 15:24, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Sì, mi sembra di aver sistemato tutto quello che avevo notato. Però ho visto che le foto di Giorgio Sommer presentavano un po' tutte dei problemi e delle dimenticanze, e così me le sono fatte a tappeto. Non ho finito però ancora del tutto, perchè attualmente sono molto preso dal riordino del Museo di Capodimonte. Vorrei finire di sistemare tutte le foto ancora sotto "Giorgio Sommer" e sotto "Photographs of Giorgio Sommer". Quello che ho fatto è di sistemare tutte quelle delle città della Campania e quelle della Svizzera. Ho creato anche alcune nuove sottocategorie. Ho anche controllato che le foto da me trattate figurassero nel Catalogo, e lì ho poi integrato e corretto dove necessario tutte le didascalie. Poi ho fatto cambiare a Delinker il nome di alcuni files palesemente errati (come nome o come numero). Quello che va fatto è sistemare le foto nelle loro categorie cittadine già esistenti, e se sono almeno tre, di creare la relativa sottocategoria, da agganciare poi alle "Historical images" della città e della regione; oltre che dare la categoria del soggetto rappresentato. Insomma, è abbastanza impegnativo. Se nel frattempo ti ci vuoi mettere tu, nulla in contrario; altrimenti tornerò a finire tutto appena mi libero del Museo di Capodimonte. Fammi sapere. Ciao! --DenghiùComm (talk) 20:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

....Ho visto... ho visto! Debbo pensare allora che la sua opposizione è solo una ubriacatura da potere...!!! Comunque ancora grazie infinite per il tuo consiglio. Non sapevo assolutamente che vi era la possibilità di chiedere e di avere avere questi poteri. Molto interessante! Ciao! (oggi voglio tornare ad ordinare Sommer. Per tirarmi sù... Ho avuto una settimana malefica piena di guai... Gestern ist noch mein Wagen "gestorben"... auf der Autobahn ! Mamma mia! Aber ich lebe noch....!) Saluti. --DenghiùComm (talk) 14:30, 17 September 2011 (UTC) PS: wie hast du überhaupt gemerkt dass da eine Diskussion war (bei mir) über die Fotos von Giorgio Sommer?

Ciao Occhio-Di-Pesce-Gatto. Per le due foto troverai la risposta nella mia talk page. Volevo dirti, giusto per informarti sui criteri adottati, che nel catalogo di Giorgio Sommer, nelle didascalie ho usato il bis solo quando per lo stesso numero vi sono due soggetti diversi (p.es. 5556) oppure quando la foto mostra lo stesso soggetto ma sono due foto differenti (p. es. 1116 o 1117), e non quando si tratta di due stampe diverse ma dello stesso negativo (p. es. 5509). Qui il bis andrà tolto. Giusto per applicare lo stesso criterio. Ti auguro una buona serata! --DenghiùComm (talk) 16:52, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Ciao. Non so se, in attesa che io faccia la domanda e che mi venga accordato quel piccolo potere, nel frattempo tu volessi cambiare i nomi a quei files. Te li segnalo, ma tu non sentirti minimamente in obbligo di farlo; solo se tu vuoi e se hai tempo e voglia. I titoli nuovi da me proposti li troverai nella cronologia dei singoli files. Allora si tratta di File:Sommer, Giorgio - Palazzo reale e la marina di Napoli, ca. 1865.jpg, File:Sommer, Giorgio (1834-1914) - n. ... - Capri.jpg, File:Sommer, Giorgio (1834-1914) - Bologna - Panorama.jpg, File:Sommer, Giorgio (1834-1914) - Capri - ca. 1880 - 01.jpg. Ce n'è ancora un altro, ma me lo voglio ricontrollare con maggiore precisione. Ti ripeto, solo se ti va ! Ciao e grazie per tutto quello che fai. --DenghiùComm (talk) 21:38, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Madonna !! Ma sei velocissima ! (lavori per caso per la NASA ?) Grazie infinite !! e buona notte. --DenghiùComm (talk) 21:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

e molto facile, lo vedrai. :) Buona notte! Catfisheye (talk) 21:57, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Gesundes kann so köstlich sein.[edit]

Himbeerteller01.jpg Bitte nimm noch welche...
... und bediene Dich auch sonst, so lange der Vorrat reicht. Schwäbin (talk) 07:38, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Liebe Schwäbin, ich muss schon sagen - deine Essensfotos sind echt gemein! Ich wusste nicht, was ich mir von der Galerie auf de:user:Schwäbin aussuchen soll und mir läuft das Wasser im Mund zusammen. :) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 20:07, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Danke, Saibo, aber Du weißt ja, dass Du bei mir noch ein (wirkliches) Essen gut hast. Insofern hält sich mein Mitleid in Grenzen ;-) --Schwäbin (talk) 21:04, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Figurine[edit]

Bzgl. einer bestimmten Figurine bin ich ja mal gespannt, ob die Hochstufung von Soapstone nach Category:Art made from steatite dauerhaft ist! Übrigens sind da auch Zwischenstadien bei. --Alupus (talk) 21:50, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Foto di Giorgio Sommer[edit]

Ciao Cat. Allora nel poco tempo che ho in questo periodo, vediamo di fare di nuovo qualcosa di utile, e non dover rincorrere stupide posizioni che fanno solo perdere tempo e tranquillità. Sie sollen diese Suppe selbst auslöffeln ! Ti segnalo allora alcune foto "illegibili" alle quali poi puoi dare il nome corretto secondo gli standard di Dall'Orto. Ti metto fra virgolette quello che si legge e così come è scritto sulla foto.

Infine File:Sommer, Giorgio (1834-1914) - Palermo - Monte Pellegrino.jpg, è una foto che mi fa molta rabbia, perchè la scritta si legge molto bene e le ultime tre cifre anche (000); ma il primo numero si legge malissimo: potrebbe essere un 1 o un 2 o un 3. Incredibile! E il catalogo anche non ci aiuta... Credo che questa la dobbiamo lasciare così come è, a meno che tu non voglia assegnarle il numero x000. La scritta che si legge è questa: "x000 PALERMO. Monte Pellegrino". ✓ Done

Posso chiederti un altro favore? Se cambi il nome a questi files, se puoi anche aggiornare e/o correggere la Description. E controllare le categorie assegnate. E spostare le foto nel catalogo, naturalmente! Sempre e solo se tu lo vuoi; altrimenti poi lo farò io, gelegentlich.... Grazie infinite!!. Ciao und Alles Gute! --DenghiùComm (talk) 07:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Dengiù, als hier Mitlesender habe ich mir erlaubt, das Bild Napoli Costume mal als ersten Schritt auf einen Dateinamen mit der richtigen Katalognummer wie auf dem Bild aufgestempelt zu verschieben. Bei PALERMO Monte Pellegrino werde ich mal versuchen, via harter Kontrastverschärfung in Photoshops-RAW-Konverter vielleicht etwas mehr Information aus der ersten Stempelziffer zu gewinnen. --Alupus (talk) 14:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Tausend Dank ! --DenghiùComm (talk) 16:03, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Denghiù, beim Palermo-Bild ist es eher die Nr. 3000, da man oben einen Bogen rechts abwärts und unten eine Bogen rechts aufwärts sieht. Aber die erste Ziffer ist auch nach den Photoshop-Spielereien mehr als undeutlich zu sehen. Schließlich sind die Ziffern kaum zehn Pixel hoch. Gruß, --Alupus (talk) 22:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Kann es vielleicht nr. 9000 sein? Da gibt es schon eine...! --DenghiùComm (talk) 14:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Ich mache in den nächsten Tagen einen neuen Bearbeitungs-Versuch. Nach dem Katalog kann es ja an und für sich nicht die 3.000 sein. --Alupus (talk) 20:41, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Ciao Denghiù, lo farò, però pianpiano, mo mi manca semplicemente il tempo. Sperò che stai bene! Herzliche Grüße Catfisheye (talk) 21:19, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Ciao Cat. Ti segnalo ancora :

Scusa, che ho messo così tanto, ma avevo da finire la mia tesi. Allora c'è speranza che in futuro sarò più veloce! :) Mit herzlichem Gruße Catfisheye (talk) 23:45, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Ciao Catfisheye. Mach dir doch keine Vorwürfe! das fehlt jetzt gerade noch...! Nicht nur machst du mir eine grosse Arbei, und hast dazu noch schuldgefühle... Io ti segnalo i file; non prendere queste segnalazioni come un ordine! Puoi anche non farlo o farlo dopo un anno...! Comunque bist ein richtiger Schatz !!! Salutoni, --DenghiùComm (talk) 07:04, 19 November 2011 (UTC) PS : viel Erfolg mit deiner Tesi !!!

Permission to reproduce the photo in textbooks for Hong Kong preschool pupils[edit]

On behalf of Educational Publishing House Limited, I am writing to ask for permission to use the painted bug photo (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Painted_Bug.jpg) in our English textbook and relating supplementary resources, including (but not limited to) electronic books, picture cards for Hong Kong preschool pupils. If we are permitted to use the photo, an acknowledgment will be printed in our book. I look forward to receiving your reply and I'd be very grateful to receive your permission. Please kindly take a look at the following statement as the acknowlegment:

Acknowledgments For permission to reproduce photographs in this book, we would like to thank the following: Umberto Salvagnin / Wikimedia Commons Every effort has been made to contact the copyright holders, but in the event of any accidental infringement, we would be more than pleased to come to a suitable arrangement with the rightful owner.

Interessa ?[edit]

Ciao Catfisheye. Prima di tutto grazie mille per tutto il lavoro che tu fai per me ! (Mi sento un po' in colpa per tutte le richieste che ti faccio...!). Senti, guarda che cosa ho trovato qui. Ti interessa? E' una cartolina del 1919, e corrisponde alla foto Sommer 6204. Pensi che sia il caso di caricarla su Commons? Come ti regoli in questi casi? Un abbraccio, --DenghiùComm (talk) 17:08, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Ciao Denghiù questo caso è abbastanza speciale, perché non sono identici: c'è un cane sulla sinistra dell'uomo e un ragazzo è sparito e dal altro è rimasto solo l'ombra. Mi sa che è della stessa seria e di Sommer, ma non si sa per certo. Sul commons sono abbastanza severi, non so se basta di attribuirlo.
Guarda un po' per curiosità, mi sa che è davanti dello stesse stabilimento, però un po' spostato:

Sei auch Du auf's Herzlichste gegrüßt! Catfisheye (talk) 20:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

E' incredibile ! Interessantissimo ! Direi che la foto Sommer = cartolina (come base), ma la cartolina è molto manomessa con aggiunte e rimozioni di vari personaggi. Rispetto alla foto U & U è chiaro che si tratta della stessa ditta ed edificio. Sarebbe interessante chiarire se questa impresa si trovava a Napoli o piuttosto a Torre Annunziata (dove si trovavano la maggior parte delle fabbriche di maccheroni). Voglio fare qualche ricerca se riesco a scoprire questa fabbrica di Manzo Michele dove si trovava esattamente. Vedremo. Se scopro qualcosa, ti faccio sapere. Ciao ! --DenghiùComm (talk) 15:26, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Prima scoperta: la ditta esiste ancora con lo stesso nome e si troverebbe a Mugnano di Napoli, un comune del hinterland di Napoli. Alla prima occasione che io mi trovo in quella zona la cerco. Sarebbe bellissimo se il vecchio edificio esistesse ancora...! Farei allora una foto e la aggiungerei a queste (Gestern und Heute). Sarebbe divertente, no? --DenghiùComm (talk) 16:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Devo ammettere di aver già cercato questo negozio via Google Street View, ma niente. Allora magari ti conviene di chiarmarli prima di andarci. Sarebbe molto bello se trovi l'edificio! (o una "vecchietta" che ti può raccontare un po' su.) Sarei grata se mi informi! Mit liebem Gruße Catfisheye (talk) 18:35, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Hallo[edit]

Warum lädtst Du solche Bilder hoch? Kein Name, kein Ort, keinerlei Chance, es irgendwo einzubinden. Bleibt wohl nur Löschen. gruss Rauenstein (talk) 20:52, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Schloss Boitzenburg. Löschen also unnötig. --Alupus (talk) 23:13, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Danke Alupus für das Nachtragen der Information. Lieber Gruß Catfisheye (talk) 01:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

File:London Ophthalmic Infirmary, Finsbury - uncoloured & cropped.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:54, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

File:London Ophthalmic Infirmary, Finsbury - uncoloured.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:55, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

St Mary Moorfields shopping passage[edit]

Schau mal hier: [1] CC...2.0 ist doch ok? Wenn ja, würdest du es bitte hochladen, du kennst dich ja aus mit Flickr-Uploads! Danke im voraus. --Alupus (talk) 23:17, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Schönes Bild, leider no commercial use erlaubt und damit nicht frei genug. (Was ich diese Einschränkung hasse...) :( Liebe Grüße Catfisheye (talk) 23:40, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Entschuldige bitte, dass ich damit bemüht habe, es war ja schon spät/früh und ich war schon halb weggedämmert, hätte mir ja auch in der Überschrift (!) auffallen können :(. --Alupus (talk) 22:46, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Hö Überschrift? kopfkratz. Ich finde es toll, dass Du nachschaust! 4 Augen sehen mehr als 2! :) Catfisheye (talk) 23:19, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Nicht in der Ü. hier, die war reine Stimmungsmache... . In der Überschrift der verlinkten Lizenzbeschreibung stand non commercial dick und fett. Ich seh' schon, muß da wohl doch hin. Dafür nach L. zu fahren ist so, na ja... , dass ich zunehmend Geschmack dran finde. Vorher müßt aber noch das Superweitwinkel her und davor dessen bereits angegangene Refinanzierung klappen.
Bevor ich größenwahnsinnig werde, höre ich lieber auf für diese Nacht :). --Alupus (talk) 23:47, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Hier steht keine Lizenz beim Bild unmittelbar -oder überseh ich da was? Wenn nicht, müßte doch die GNU ganz unten gelten. --Alupus (talk) 15:56, 27 November 2011 (UTC) Wenn ich jetzt sage, dass das Bild so dolle nicht ist, fährst Du hoffentlich nicht extra nach London... *duckundwech* Catfisheye (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC) Och menno, weder Bild noch Tourchen... . Nee, kein Geld für solche Extratouren. Dafür: War heut in meinem persönlichen WLM (Petrus Cuypers) Dingens unterwegs, eine zehnjährige meinte geknipst worden zu sein, ruft ihre Mutti im bezahlbaren Cuypersbau herbei - wir unterhalten uns aber nett in D und Nl durcheinander, und sie gibt mir 'nen Tipp, wo eine Straße weiter noch eins steht :). Bild folgt. --Alupus (talk) 21:20, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Neues Autochrom fürs Projekt[edit]

Ich schau heute morgen in ein niederländisches Fotobuch und sehe dort ein gutes Autochrom von Frank Eugene, google danach (hab' ich beim Googlen bisher nach Eugene noch nicht gesehen) und bekommme dieses Digitalisat in schöner Auflösung: [2] Nach US-Recht ja gemeinfrei, so oder so. Von irgendwelchen Schutzrechtsberühmungen sehe ich nichts, soweit ich es lesen kann. Wie siehts du die Hochladbarkeit? Allerdings gibts auf der Website auch eine Menge unfreier Sachen zu sehen, so rein urheberrechtlich betrachtet. --Alupus (talk) 05:21, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Link funzt leider nicht. Hast i. Ü. Mail und frohen Nikolaus! :D Catfisheye (talk) 07:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Die Mail las ich ohne das hier zu lesen und den Tag vergaß ich: Frohen Nikolaus auch Dir! Der Link funzt bei mir auch nicht mehr, dass schien doch ein offizieller Laden aus Israel zu sein, komisch. Komm auch nicht auf die Homepage selbst. Geb ich aber in der Bildesuche "Frank Eugene: Kitty Stieglitz" ein, ist es als erstes in der Vorschau, bloss es lädt auch nicht hoch, hää? Da gibts auch noch ein zweites Autochrom, Stieglitz seine erste Frau Emmeline zeigend, wo sie den - echten - Simplissimus (Zeitschrift) liest, das find ich trotz, nein nicht wg. des S., sondern, ach das lass ich lieber, qualitätiv besser, ist aber Eugene nur zugeschrieben, und könnt daher auch vom Stieglitz selbst sein. --Alupus (talk) 18:21, 6 December 2011 (UTC) PS: Das Autochrom muß zu den ersten Autochromes gehören, die der Kreis um Stieglitz im Spätsommer 1907 machte, sie sind daher - wg. des Lobes über das Verfahren durch Stieglitz und Co. und ihrer sogleich gegebenen auch künstlerischen Qualität - für die Verbreitungsgeschichte der Autochromes bedeutsam. Nach Buch sind die Dias vorhanden beim Art Institute of Chicago, Alfred-Stieglitz-Collection.
Probier bitte noch mal den Link, bei mir funzt er heute wieder. --08:13, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
<Schaust du bitte nochmal? (hab was neues endeckt :) ) --Alupus (talk) 16:42, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, zu antworten vergessen. Hm, es gibt da so komplizierte Regeln, was US-Recht betrifft. Paulae hat mich da mal zu de:Alexander Binder (Fotograf) belehrt. Aber auf de:wp sehe ich da keinerlei Probleme. Hübsche Kitty. :) Catfisheye (talk) 16:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Weißt du was, ich frag hmal bei einem Commons-Admin nach. Blinkspielerei kannst du wegmachen, oder ich machs :) --17:40, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Paul Bergon[edit]

Die Kategorie füllt sich: [3]. Nochmal Danke für dieses Artikelgeschenk zu Nikolaus! --Alupus (talk) 23:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Danke![edit]

...fürs Hinterherräumen. Erst durch dich über den Umweg Martin Sesaker kam ich auf Presseartikel zu den Sportlern. Ich hab auch so unheimlich viel gemacht, es wird Wochen dauern, das zu ordnen. --Ralf Roleček 11:55, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Leider[edit]

gibts von der Paulskirche keine Bilder von mir fürs Projekt, innen ist ja keine Panofreiheit, und außen wars nur trüb über trüb. Für die Aufschrift auf dem auf dem Weg dahin gesehenen Bagger konnte ich aber nichts, ich mußte allerdings schon schmunzeln... Hoffe, du nimmst mir das nicht übel ;) --Alupus (talk) 21:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Ähm, habe ich unwissentlich Fotografieraufträge verteilt? Und übelnehmen? Übel nehme ich der Volkssolidarität, dass sie mich gestern fast zu Brei gefahren hätte. Aber sonst? Catfisheye (talk) 22:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Schön dich mal wieder zu sehen![edit]

Schön dich mal wieder zu sehen! :-) Ist zwar schon etwas spät.. aber dennoch: beste Wünsche fürs Jahr 2012! --Saibo (Δ) 05:51, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Dir auch lieber Saibo! Zum Wohl! :) Catfisheye (talk) 11:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

File:PORSCHE 959 CABRIO SPEEDSTER.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:PORSCHE 959 CABRIO SPEEDSTER.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

F330P4 (talk) 12:11, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected File:Cast iron Northland Transportation model bus.jpg

Eleassar (t/p) 06:01, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

R: G. Sommer[edit]

Delizioso! Wo findest du solche Perlen? Es freut mich sehr dich wieder mal zu hören (nach der miserablen filemover Affäre...). Hoffe es geht dir gut! Alles Beste, --DenghiùComm (talk) 20:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Hei Cat, tu mi porti fortuna !!! Dopo tre anni che non ci sentivamo, guarda che cosa è successo nello stesso momento: qui !. Certo ricevere questo right in 6 minuti anziché aspettare 3 mesi per una parola chiara.... Un caro abbraccio, --DenghiùComm (talk) 09:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Ma che bella notizia! Fantastico! Finalmente! :D Sono felice per te. Catfisheye (talk) 13:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

A clay house[edit]

Hi. I took this picture in a rural area in Khorasan Razavi, Iran. Can I ask you what attracted you about this picture? Bbadree (talk) 20:10, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Danke für die Einsortierung[edit]

Für mich sind Autos nur Maschinen, die Benzin fressen :-) Den Rest macht die Werkstatt. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 18:42, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Chocolates bokeh.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Chocolates bokeh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Smial (talk) 08:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Meurtre cosmétique.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Meurtre cosmétique.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Meurtre cosmétique.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Meurtre cosmétique.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected File:Santa image, 19th century.jpg

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 06:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:1840s Fashion Print Le Follet.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1840s Fashion Print Le Follet.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Little Blackfeet. 10.jpg[edit]

There are words "Clarence Ellsworth 1939" on bottom right corner. Do you know, who is he? Maybe copyright holder? When he died? Taivo (talk) 10:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I guess this picture shouldn't be here. It had a compatible license on Flickr, but it seems as if Ellsworth died in '61.[4] I'll ask for delete. Have a nice day! Catfisheye (talk) 08:48, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Schleswig-Holstein, Büsum, Alter Friedhof NIK 9461.jpg[edit]

Moin, du kannst doch Dänisch. Kannst du die Bildbeschreibung übersetzen, dann wird es auch in Dänemark gefunden? In WP:DE haben wir keinen Artikel, vielleicht bei euch... Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 19:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Entrata della UCSC.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Entrata della UCSC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

82.113.121.157 00:35, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Mortadella[edit]

E4024 (talk) 13:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 00:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lord Belbury (talk) 18:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)