User talk:Kersti Nebelsiek
| Babel user information | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
| Users by language |
User talk:Kersti Nebelsiek/Archiv
Contents
- 1 "Babys in pouches"
- 2 Ahem
- 3 Category:Periparus_ater_(illustrations)
- 4 File:BelgianDraftHorse.jpg
- 5 File:Estrutura feijao.svg and other SVGs
- 6 Category:Lens (anatomy)
- 7 Cardellina canadensis
- 8 Category:Sheep_testicles
- 9 Category:Bay foals with their mothers
- 10 Get consensus
- 11 Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!
- 12 Category:Histopathology of hemosiderosis
- 13 Category:Diseases and disorders of inner ear
"Babys in pouches"[edit]
Hello, if you are going to create the marsupial pouches categories, please spell it "babies in pouches" instead of "babys". Also, it would help to have parent categories, maybe add them to the anatomy categories. This would help with organization. Thanks for your help. If you don't correct the spelling, I will do it, please don't be offended and don't revert corrections. Have fun, Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- You didn't correct the spelling you changed the category to something completely different, which isn't correct. A whole kangoroo with a baby in the pouch ist not simply a pouch. It schouldn't be directly in the kangoroo pouch category, but it is ok to put the category "Category:Marsupialia with babies in pouches" as a whole in "Category:Marsupial pouches". It's the same principle why you dont put cats with blue eyes directly in the cat eyes category but it is ok to do so via a "cats with blue eyes"-category.
- Additionally for "Category:Marsupialia with babies in pouches" an anatomy category is an incorrect parent category, as it is not about anatomy but it is primarily a mother with child category. Kersti (talk) 17:08, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Ahem[edit]
Hello Kersti. Just to let you know about this edit. I’ve fixed the problem. Carry on. Green Giant (talk) 10:29, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Category:Periparus_ater_(illustrations)[edit]
 |
Periparus ater (illustrations) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/01/Category:Periparus_ater_(illustrations).
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
File:BelgianDraftHorse.jpg[edit]
|
File:BelgianDraftHorse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Jcb (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Estrutura feijao.svg and other SVGs[edit]
Hi Kersti,
this is not English!--Geologiya (talk) 15:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Category:Lens (anatomy)[edit]
Of course you are right. The problem is that management was not finished yet, and all the images in this category I have moved to a new category (I just created): Category:Human lens. In the same way I had already created Category:Orbit (anatomy) -> Category:Human orbit. Finally I added a new category to Schneckenauge.jpg. Thanks. --Jmarchn (talk) 18:04, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Cardellina canadensis[edit]
Hi! I am about to remove your template for VN from the category so it can use wikidata. I am sad about this because the template is really nice. Category:Cardellina canadensis. I guess that is all. (sniffle)--RaboKarbakian (talk) 18:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Category:Sheep_testicles[edit]
|
|
Sheep testicles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/05/Category:Sheep_testicles.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 11:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Category:Bay foals with their mothers[edit]
Hey, I noticed you recently created Category:Bay foals with their mothers. Can you explain why this is a meaningful distinction from any other foals with their mothers, and bay foals in any other context? Cat Bay foals is pretty bloated, but IMO we could split it in some other ways that could be more useful. Such as by stage of coat development (before, during, after first coat shed). And of course at this point we can remove less than decent photos from the category. Glad to see you back btw! --Pitke (talk) 12:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
- If you think, that there is a better way of splitting the categories this would be ok for me. On the other hand I think that there are enough bay foals not yet categoriced as bay foals, that alls these distinktions could be made without having categories with less than 20 photos. Kersti (talk) 08:27, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Get consensus[edit]
Sorry, you don’t have consensus to remove images from existing categories. Mark Marathon (talk) 00:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open![edit]
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.
Dear Kersti Nebelsiek,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.
Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Category:Histopathology of hemosiderosis[edit]
Hello! See how I recategorized this category, creating Category:Hemosiderosis. Thanks. Jmarchn (talk) 15:41, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Category:Diseases and disorders of inner ear[edit]
I don't agree with your change (you has been moved this category to Category:Inner ear), because all its content is referred only to human diseases. Of course exists this diseases in others mammals and vertebrates. When someone uploads a file/s referred to diseases of mammals or other vertebrates then it could be created Category:Human diseases and disorders of inner ear. --Jmarchn (talk) 16:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
@Jmarchn:
- I don't agree that vertigo is a human disease. - it is based on the general functioning of the mammalian inner ear, therefore it should exist in all mammals. Of course it is a subjective symptom and animals can't tell us, that they feel vertigo, therefore it ist difficult to diagnose it in animals.
- It is not true that examples of diseases of the inner ear in animals are not yet uploadet. But if you hide the approbiate categories in the human diseases category tree it is a real problem to categorice them properly!
- A category named Category:Diseases and disorders of inner ear has simply the wrong name to be a subcategory of Category:Human inner ear
- Homozygous merle dogs in some cases are deaf due to problems in the inner ear, same is correct for Dalmatians
- en:Congenital sensorineural deafness in cats is a congenital deafness caused by a degeneration of the inner ear.
--Kersti (talk) 18:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Ok, I created Category:Diseases and disorders of human inner ear and fill it. --Jmarchn (talk) 20:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
