User talk:Milseburg
Contents
- 1 Contakt me
- 2 A barnstar for you!
- 3 Valued Image Promotion
- 4 Quality Image Promotion
- 5 Valued Image Promotion
- 6 Quality Image Promotion
- 7 Eine andere Ansicht Deines Bildes
- 8 Quality Image Promotion
- 9 Valued Image Promotion
- 10 Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die Denkmaltopographie
- 11 Quality Image Promotion
- 12 Ich bin gerade an deinem letzten Panorama
- 13 Quality Image Promotion
- 14 Quality Image Promotion
- 15 Quality Image Promotion
- 16 Quality Image Promotion
- 17 Quality Image Promotion
- 18 Valued Image Promotion
- 19 Quality Image Promotion
- 20 Quality Image Promotion
- 21 Quality Image Promotion
- 22 Quality Image Promotion
- 23 Comments at RÃo Avia, Leiro, Ourense.JPG
- 24 Quality Image Promotion
- 25 Quality Image Promotion
- 26 Quality Image Promotion
- 27 Quality Image Promotion
- 28 Bilder Teufelsberg (Rhön)
- 29 Quality Image Promotion
- 30 Wiki Loves Earth 2015 - die Organisatoren sagen Danke
- 31 Quality Image Promotion
- 32 Valued Image Promotion
- 33 Quality Image Promotion
- 34 Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen
- 35 Quality Image Promotion
- 36 Quality Image Promotion
- 37 Quality Image Promotion
- 38 Quality Image Promotion
- 39 Quality Image Promotion
- 40 Quality Image Promotion
- 41 Quality Image Promotion
- 42 Quality Image Promotion
- 43 Quality Image Promotion
- 44 Quality Image Promotion
- 45 Kerze
- 46 Quality Image Promotion
- 47 Valued Image Promotion
- 48 Quality Image Promotion
- 49 Quality Image Promotion
- 50 Quality Image Promotion
- 51 Quality Image Promotion
- 52 „Knüllgebierge“
- 53 Quality Image Promotion
- 54 Quality Image Promotion
- 55 Quality Image Promotion
- 56 Quality Image Promotion
- 57 Quality Image Promotion
- 58 Quality Image Promotion
- 59 FP Promotion
- 60 Quality Image Promotion
- 61 Quality Image Promotion
- 62 Quality Image Promotion
- 63 Quality Image Promotion
- 64 Quality Image Promotion
- 65 Quality Image Promotion
- 66 Valued Image Promotion
- 67 Color Profile
- 68 Quality Image Promotion
- 69 FP Promotion
- 70 Quality Image Promotion
- 71 FP Promotion
- 72 Quality Image Promotion
- 73 FP Promotion
- 74 Valued Image Promotion
- 75 Quality Image Promotion
- 76 FP Promotion
- 77 Quality Image Promotion
- 78 Quality Image Promotion
- 79 Quality Image Promotion
- 80 Quality Image Promotion
- 81 Quality Image Promotion
- 82 Quality Image Promotion
- 83 Wiki Loves Earth 2016
- 84 Quality Image Promotion
- 85 Quality Image Promotion
- 86 Quality Image Promotion
- 87 Quality Image Promotion
- 88 Quality Image Promotion
- 89 Quality Image Promotion
- 90 Quality Image Promotion
- 91 Quality Image Promotion
- 92 Quality Image Promotion
- 93 FP Promotion
- 94 Quality Image Promotion
- 95 Quality Image Promotion
- 96 QI-Nominierung "Montaña del Selado - Caldera del Corazoncillo"
- 97 Danke für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Österreich
- 98 Quality Image Promotion
- 99 FP Promotion
- 100 Quality Image Promotion
- 101 Quality Image Promotion
- 102 FP Promotion
- 103 Quality Image Promotion
- 104 Quality Image Promotion
- 105 Quality Image Promotion
- 106 Quality Image Promotion
- 107 Quality Image Promotion
- 108 Quality Image Promotion
- 109 Ein Herzliches Dankeschön für Deinen WLE-Beitrag 2016
- 110 Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Österreich: Gratulation!
- 111 Quality Image Promotion
- 112 Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland
- 113 Quality Image Promotion
- 114 Quality Image Promotion
- 115 Quality Image Promotion
- 116 Quality Image Promotion
- 117 Quality Image Promotion
- 118 Quality Image Promotion
- 119 Quality Image Promotion
- 120 Quality Image Promotion
- 121 FP Promotion
- 122 Quality Image Promotion
- 123 Quality Image Promotion
- 124 Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland!
- 125 Quality Image Promotion
- 126 Quality Image Promotion
- 127 Quality Image Promotion
- 128 FP Promotion
- 129 Quality Image Promotion
- 130 Quality Image Promotion
- 131 Quality Image Promotion
- 132 Quality Image Promotion
- 133 Review of Image:San Sebastian Panorama Igeldo 001.jpg
- 134 FP Promotion
- 135 Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland
- 136 FP Promotion
- 137 Quality Image Promotion
- 138 Quality Image Promotion
- 139 Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer
- 140 FP Promotion
- 141 Quality Image Promotion
- 142 Quality Image Promotion
- 143 Quality Image Promotion
- 144 Quality Image Promotion
- 145 Quality Image Promotion
- 146 Quality Image Promotion
- 147 Quality Image Promotion
- 148 Quality Image Promotion
- 149 Quality Image Promotion
- 150 Quality Image Promotion
- 151 FP Promotion
- 152 Quality Image Promotion
- 153 Quality Image Promotion
- 154 Quality Image Promotion
- 155 Valued Image Promotion
- 156 Quality Image Promotion
- 157 Quality Image Promotion
- 158 Quality Image Promotion
- 159 Valued Image Promotion
- 160 Quality Image Promotion
- 161 Quality Image Promotion
- 162 Wiki Loves Earth 2017
- 163 Quality Image Promotion
- 164 FP Promotion
- 165 Quality Image Promotion
- 166 Quality Image Promotion
- 167 Quality Image Promotion
- 168 Quality Image Promotion
- 169 FP Promotion
- 170 Quality Image Promotion
- 171 Quality Image Promotion
- 172 Quality Image Promotion
- 173 Quality Image Promotion
- 174 Bubenbader Stein
- 175 Quality Image Promotion
- 176 Quality Image Promotion
- 177 Wiki Loves Earth 2017 - Danke, und wie geht es weiter?
- 178 FP Promotion
- 179 Quality Image Promotion
- 180 Quality Image Promotion
- 181 FP Promotion
- 182 FP Promotion
- 183 Quality Image Promotion
- 184 Quality Image Promotion
- 185 Quality Image Promotion
- 186 Quality Image Promotion
- 187 Quality Image Promotion
- 188 Quality Image Promotion
- 189 Quality Image Promotion
- 190 Quality Image Promotion
- 191 Quality Image Promotion
- 192 WLE 2017 - Top100
- 193 Quality Image Promotion
- 194 Quality Image Promotion
- 195 FP Promotion
- 196 Quality Image Promotion
- 197 Quality Image Promotion
- 198 Quality Image Promotion
- 199 Quality Image Promotion
- 200 Valued Image Promotion
- 201 Quality Image Promotion
- 202 Quality Image Promotion
- 203 Quality Image Promotion
- 204 Quality Image Promotion
- 205 FP Promotion
- 206 Quality Image Promotion
- 207 Quality Image Promotion
- 208 Quality Image Promotion
- 209 FP Promotion
- 210 Quality Image Promotion
- 211 Quality Image Promotion
- 212 FP Promotion
- 213 Quality Image Promotion
- 214 Quality Image Promotion
- 215 Quality Image Promotion
- 216 Valued Image Promotion
- 217 Quality Image Promotion
- 218 Quality Image Promotion
- 219 Quality Image Promotion
- 220 Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland!
- 221 Quality Image Promotion
- 222 FP Promotion
- 223 FP Promotion
- 224 Welcome, Dear Filemover!
- 225 Quality Image Promotion
- 226 Quality Image Promotion
- 227 Danke für die Teilnahme bei WikiDaheim 2017 in Österreich!
- 228 Quality Image Promotion
- 229 QIC Seceda-Panorama
- 230 Quality Image Promotion
- 231 Quality Image Promotion
- 232 Quality Image Promotion
- 233 Quality Image Promotion
- 234 Quality Image Promotion
- 235 Quality Image Promotion
- 236 Quality Image Promotion
- 237 FP Promotion
- 238 Quality Image Promotion
- 239 Quality Image Promotion
- 240 Herzlichen Glückwunsch!
- 241 Quality Image Promotion
- 242 FP Promotion
- 243 Quality Image Promotion
- 244 Quality Image Promotion
- 245 FP Promotion
- 246 Quality Image Promotion
- 247 Quality Image Promotion
- 248 Quality Image Promotion
- 249 Valued Image Promotion
- 250 Quality Image Promotion
- 251 Quality Image Promotion
- 252 FP Promotion
- 253 Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
- 254 Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
- 255 Valued Image Promotion
- 256 Wiki Loves Earth 2018
- 257 Quality Image Promotion
- 258 Quality Image Promotion
- 259 Quality Image Promotion
- 260 Quality Image Promotion
- 261 Valued Image Promotion
- 262 Quality Image Promotion
- 263 Quality Image Promotion
- 264 FP Promotion
- 265 Quality Image Promotion
- 266 Quality Image Promotion
- 267 Quality Image Promotion
- 268 Quality Image Promotion
- 269 Quality Image Promotion
- 270 Quality Image Promotion
- 271 Quality Image Promotion
- 272 Quality Image Promotion
- 273 FP Promotion
- 274 Quality Image Promotion
- 275 FP Promotion
- 276 FP Promotion
- 277 Quality Image Promotion
- 278 Quality Image Promotion
- 279 Quality Image Promotion
- 280 Quality Image Promotion
- 281 FP Promotion
- 282 Quality Image Promotion
- 283 Quality Image Promotion
- 284 Valued Image Promotion
- 285 Quality Image Promotion
- 286 Quality Image Promotion
- 287 FP Promotion
- 288 Wiki Loves Earth 2018
- 289 Quality Image Promotion
- 290 Quality Image Promotion
Contakt me[edit]
Bei de.wikipedia Benutzer Diskussion:Milseburg erreichst du mich besser.
Better try de.wikipedia Benutzer Diskussion:Milseburg to reach me. --Milseburg (talk) 11:08, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Photographer's Barnstar |
| Tolles Arnsberg-Panorama mit hilfreicher Beschriftung! Aarp65 (talk) 10:52, 7 December 2013 (UTC) |
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
-Panorama.jpg){kind=small}
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Labed panoramas of Wetterau and Taunus Hausberg (Taunus).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Support Very good image with useful inscriptions, therefore I support it. However some people might prefer plain image without these inscriptions, so I also suggest uploading the plain version too. Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Freigerichter Fernblick.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diemelsee (See).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama Wildseeloder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Eine andere Ansicht Deines Bildes[edit]
Siehe mal hier.--79.214er (talk) 19:28, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama Bad Orb.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Inversion (meteorology) on Wasserkuppe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Comment What is interesting is inversion on this site. I Sugere that the scope should be "Inversion (meteorology) on 
Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die Denkmaltopographie[edit]
Hallo Milseburg,
vor zehn Tagen endete der vierte Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.
Mit mehr als 35 Tausend Fotos hat Deutschland wie in den Vorjahren ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht und einen Anteil von 14 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 40 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 651 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Schon zum Abschluss des Wettbewerbs waren rund 6000 Fotos (=17 %) in Listen und Artikel eingebunden. Einen detaillierten Überblick zu den Fotos, den Bundesländern und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite.
Die deutsche Jury hat nun die eingereichten Beiträge übernommen und ist gegenwärtig dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu den Kulturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am nächsten Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg. Du darfst gespannt sein und all Deine Freunde bitten, Dir die Daumen zu drücken.
Die preisgekrönten 100 Gewinner-Fotos werden in der Woche ab dem 20. Oktober veröffentlicht. Auf dieser Grundlage wird auch in diesem Jahr ein Kalender-Poster für 2015 gedruckt werden.
Auf zwei Möglichkeiten einer weiteren aktiven Mitwirkung an unserem Denkmal-Projekt möchten wir bei dieser Gelegenheit hinweisen bzw. Dich dazu einladen:
- Unsere Freunde in Österreich haben mit einem gerade gestarteten Denkmal-Cup das Editieren von Denkmallisten und Denkmalartikeln in den Focus gerückt. Bis Ende des Jahres kannst Du Punkte sammeln und Preise gewinnen. Dabei geht es mit diesem Wettbewerb nicht nur um Kulturdenkmale in AT oder D, sondern generell um Denkmale in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, als offen für alle Länder.
- Vom 6.-8. November findet erneut die Europäische Denkmalmesse in Leipzig statt. Mit Unterstützung von Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. werden wir zum zweiten Mal die Ergebnisse von Wiki Loves Monuments im Rahmen eines Standes sowie eines Workshops vorstellen.
- WLM-Aktivisten sind herzlich eingeladen, bei der Betreuung des Messestandes sowie in den Gesprächen über Möglichkeiten einer partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit mit den Denkmalbehörden mitzuwirken. Die Reisekosten übernimmt für 8-10 registrierte Standbetreuer WMDE. Es muss nicht der gesamte Messezeitraum sein, auch eine Mitwirkung an 2 Tagen hilft uns, den Beitrag der Wikipedia für die Denkmaltopographie sichtbar zu machen.
Und schließlich gilt: Nach dem Wettbewerb ist vor dem Wettbewerb. Bereits jetzt kann jeder mit der Planung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 beginnen. Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.
Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.
( Bernd Gross), 11.10.2014
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Rimberg-Panorama 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Ich bin gerade an deinem letzten Panorama[edit]
und stelle mir die Frage, ob du Lightroom benutzt oder Photoshop CC. Wenn eines von beiden (oder beide) dann hätte ich ein paar Ideen, wie man dein letztes Panorama verbessern könnte (Kompliment fürs Stitchen!), denn die Tiefen links vorne und im Prinzip überall lassen sich gegenüber dem sonnigeren Teil des Panos rechts deutlich verbessern. Auch ist noch etwas mit der Schärfe drinnen. Ich fände es schade, wenn man es mit einem einfachen QI-Good Quality abtut. --Hubertl (talk) 09:22, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Besten Dank für die Rückmeldung! Bei mir hat es bislang nur zu Photoshop Elements 9.0 gereicht. Bezüglich der Tiefen hattest du natürlich vollkommen recht. Das ich darauf nicht selbst gekommen bin! Wahrscheinlich lenkte mich der Ärger über die hinderlichen Bäume zu sehr ab. Ich habe die Tiefen nun aufgehellt. Bezüglich der Schärfe bin ich für Tipps dankbar. Ich bin immer unschlüssig, ob ich über "Schärfe einstellen" oder "Unscharf maskieren" vorgehen soll, und welche Werte da einzustellen sind. liebe Grüße --Milseburg (talk) 13:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Ich kenne Adobe Elements nicht, denke aber, dass die dort eingesetzten Schärfefunktionen dieselbe Funktionalität bzw. Möglichkeit hat wie in Photoshop. Ich verwende, seit ich Photoshop kenne (25 Jahre) eigentlich nie die Schärfefunktion, sondern gehe immer über Unschärfe maskieren. Ich habe schlichtweg mehr Kontrolle. Wieviel davon, das ist von Bild zu Bild verschieden, auch der Radius ist unterschiedlich, den es einzustellen gilt. Ich muss aber gestehen, ich verwende erst seit ein paar Monaten Photoshop CC, bislang hatte ich das Auslangen mit einer alten Version, die es jetzt sogar kostenlos von Adobe gibt. CS2. Ich würde aber mit dem Denken über Schärfe schon vorher beginnen, zB. bei der Kamera auf dem Stativ schon einmal den Stabilisator ausschalten und grundsätzlich nur Fernauslösen (oder zumindest mit 2sec Verzögerung). Und wenn es auch nur leicht windig ist, gleich mal unten ans Stativ einen dicken Stein anhängen, das macht das leichteste Stativ stabil (ich hab immer einen Strick dabei, kann ja auch der Rucksack mit dem Saft sein). Scharfstellen über die digitale Vergrößerung auf einen bestimmten Punkt. Dann schwenken. Aber ich denke, dass dir das ja wahrscheinlich mehr als mir vertraut ist. Aber manchesmal kann man schon einen Tipp mehr gebrauchen. Ich selbst habe hier in Wien praktisch immer Wind, oft böig, deshalb kanns schon mal passieren, dass ich von jeder Aufnahme sicherheitshalber drei mache. Aber ich bewundere ja sowieso deine Aufnahmen. Und auch das Lehrkonzept dahinter. Gruß aus Wien --Hubertl (talk) 20:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Bad Muenster am Stein (Gans).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Gräbersberg-Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama Langscheid (Sorpesee).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Großer Nallenberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Ohlenkopf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Wasserkuppe von Süden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
.JPG){kind=small}
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panoramics from Hahnenkamm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.JPG) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Heidelstein (Wasserkuppe).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Hoher Doernberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Baerenberg - Gudenberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Info Thanks! I´ve given a bit more light to the dark parts yet. --Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Arnsberg-Panorama 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Comments at RÃo Avia, Leiro, Ourense.JPG[edit]
Thanks for your comments at Quality images candidates in my photo File:RÃo Avia, Leiro, Ourense.JPG, but I don't understand english very well and I don't have experience in photo retouching... I have uploaded a new version, I think that I have solved the problem of perspective..., could you review it? Thanks in advance :)! Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 23:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Kreuzberg (Arnsberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Kreuzbergkapelle (Arnsberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Dunes of Amrum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
_360%C2%B0.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Lemberg (Schwäbische Alb) 360°.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama Geigelstein 360°.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Bilder Teufelsberg (Rhön)[edit]
Moin! Ich bin gerade an einem Artikel über den o.a. Berg. Hast Du vielleicht in Deinem Bestand auch noch Bilder von dieser Kuppe, die Du ggf. hochladen könntest? Wenn Du dich bei der Aufnahme von File:Hohe Hölle (Rhön).JPG nur einen Tick weiter nach rechts gedreht hättest, hättest Du den Teufelsberg ja erwischen müssen. ;-) Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 07:52, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- ´Nabend! Der Teufelsberg ist keine besonders eigenständige und auffallende Erhebung. Daher habe ich ihn noch nie gezielt ins Visier genommen. Aus Richtung Mosbach sieht man ihn hinter dem Rücken zwischen Himmeldunkberg und Simmelsberg gar nicht. Ich habe Aufnahmen vom Gipfel des Simmelsbergs und des Himmeldunkbergs, wo er zufällig drauf ist. Allerdings geht er da vor dem Hintergrund anderer Berge ziemlich unter. Vom Rockenstein oder Arnsberg müsste man ihn gut aufnehmen können. Ich denke daran, wenn ich demnächst wieder in der Rhön bin. Bis dahin gibt es noch File:Himmeldunkberg.jpg. Eine alte Aufnahme von mir, wo ich den Teufelsberg annotiert habe. Vielleicht ist die als Übergangslösung brauchbar. Gruß --Milseburg (talk) 18:29, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hallo! Vielen Dank, die Datei vom Himmeldunkberg hatte ich mir schon angesehen und gehofft, was erkennen zu können. Aber dann weiß ich ja auch, warum ich den "Berg" nicht auf Anhieb gefunden habe. Dass der nicht auffällig sein kann, habe ich dann beim gestrigen Blick auf die topographische Karte auch gemerkt. Aber da sich jemand den Artikel bei de:Wikipedia:Spiele/Drei Wünsche frei gewünscht hatte, habe ich mal dran gemacht. Übrigens dachte ich bei Deinem Benutzernamen und den Fotos die Du so gemacht hast glatt, Du würdest in der Rhön wohnen. Viele Grüße aus dem Norden bei noch erträglichen Temperaturen, --Dirtsc (talk) 05:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Rimberg (Hinterland).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Wiki Loves Earth 2015 - die Organisatoren sagen Danke[edit]
Hallo Milseburg,
am 31. Mai 2015 endete der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth, an dem Du mit Deinen Bildern teilgenommen hast. Dafür möchten wir Dir herzlich danken.
Dieses Jahr haben sich 26 Länder am Wettbewerb beteiligt, insgesamt wurden dabei 108.444 Bilder hochgeladen. Aus Deutschland kamen 14.115 Fotos, was einem Anteil von 13 % entspricht. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl von 1000 Teilnehmern allein beim deutschen Wettbewerb. Einen Überblick findest du auf unserer Ergebnisseite.
Die deutsche Jury hat Ende Juni auf einer Sitzung in Fulda die Top100 und die Preisträger ausgewählt. Eine Entscheidung der internationalen Jury wird noch im Juli erwartet.
Ein anderer Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet zum fünften Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, bei dem Kultur- und Baudenkmäler bebildert werden sollen. Mit dem Fotografieren dafür kann jetzt schon begonnen werden. Vielleicht möchtest Du Dich sogar an der Organisation dieses Wettbewerbs oder von Wiki Loves Earth 2016 beteiligen?
Wir würden uns über weitere Beiträge von Dir freuen.
Viel Spaß dabei wünscht das Orga-Team.
--Blech (talk) 07:30, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Basaltfelsen Pferdskopf.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panoramics from Helfenstein.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche (Arnsberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen[edit]
Hallo Milseburg,
nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.
Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.
Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.
Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.
( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Leuchtturm Schleimünde 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Ehmsendenkmal 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Tollpoestchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Johanniskapelle (Arnsberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Hochwildstelle (Klafferscharte).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Greifenberg von Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Hochwildstelle (Hoechstein).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Heimbergturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Alheimer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Weiherberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Ringberg (Ruhla).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Le Molkenrain.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Kerze[edit]
Hallo! Vielen Dank für die Änderung der Beschreibung bei File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, St.-Jakobus-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5633.jpg. Manchmal muss ich aber doch ein wenig schmunzeln. Du schreibst in der Bemerkung, dass es "offensichtlich" sei, dass es eine Osterkerze sei. So offensichtlich finde ich es gar nicht. Hätte ich es gewusst, hätte ich es auch geschrieben. ;-) Es mag also nicht für jeden offensichtlich sein. Aber trotzdem nochmal danke! Alles Gute für's neue Jahr. --XRay talk 13:14, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Milseburg und Fliegerdenkmal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phonolith column on Dalherdakuppe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Milseburg bei Inversionswetterlage.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Abtsrodaer Kuppe von Norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Burgruine Haselstein.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Dommel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
„Knüllgebierge“[edit]
Hallo Milseburg,
beim Thema „Knüllgebierge“ geht es mir nicht um das Panorama-Foto, sondern ausschließlich darum, zu verstehen, was schief gelaufen ist. Ich vermute stark ein Cache-Problem, da mir kürzlich ein ähnlicher Effekt in einem anderen Zusammenhang aufgefallen ist. Daher die Frage: Kannst Du Dich erinnern, bei welcher Version Du das „Knüllgebierge“ herausgenommen hast? Gruß, Hasenläufer (talk) 14:49, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hallo Hasenläufer, dass neue Versionen eines Bildes auf Commons manchmal nur sehr verzögert angezeigt werden, war mir auch schon unangenehm aufgefallen, häufiger allerdings in der Preview als in voller Auflösung. Das "Knüllgebierge" mit langem ie ist aber schon seit dem 25. Oktober 2014 nicht mehr aktuell. Ein derart langes Hinterherhinken der Anzeige wäre mir neu. Gruß --Milseburg (talk) 16:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Das ist interessant. Es gibt m. E. zwei mögliche Ursachen:
- Vielleicht habe ich mir vor dem 25. Oktober 2014 die Seite Rimberg (Hinterland) und das dort eingebaute Panorama-Bild angeschaut; ich weiß es nicht, auszuschließen ist es nicht. Man müsste mal nachschauen, seit wann das Bild dort eingebunden ist. Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass mein Browser-Cache noch Daten aus dieser Zeit vorhält; zumal, weil ich immer mal wieder den Cache manuell lösche, aber nur aus Gründen der "Daten-Hygiene"; nicht weil ich ansonsten Probleme mit dem Cache hätte.
- Es könnte sich um eine Server-seitige Betriebsstörung handelt.
- Es dürfte schwierig sein, die zutreffende Ursache zu identifizieren. Ich halte die 2. Variante für wahrscheinlicher, aber das hilft nicht weiter. Der Hinweis "Refresh page for new nominations: Cache-Speicher der Seite löschen" macht mich etwas stutzig. Das lässt mich vermuten, dass es wohl schon öfter Cache-Probleme gab. Aber ein solcher Fall wie dieser darf m. E. nicht vorkommen. Gruß, --Hasenläufer (talk) 20:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Zusätzliche Anmerkung. "... dass neue Versionen eines Bildes auf Commons manchmal nur sehr verzögert angezeigt werden, war mir auch schon unangenehm aufgefallen, häufiger allerdings in der Preview als in voller Auflösung." – das kann ich auch aus meiner Sicht bestätigen. --Hasenläufer (talk) 20:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Noch eine Nachbemerkung: Mich interessiert, ob bekannte Betriebsstörungen dokumentiert und kommuniziert werden. Aber das ist bzgl. unserer Diskussion zu off-topic. --Hasenläufer (talk) 20:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Mit dem technischen Betrieb kenne ich mich hier kaum aus. Vielleicht weiß man im Commons:Forum mehr. --Milseburg (talk) 12:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Verbockt..[edit]
Ich glaube, dass du die Kandidatur wirklich selbst verbockt hast. Du hast 8 Tage zugewartet bis du reagiert hast - so auch die potentiellen Pro-Stimmer - und dann war die Kandidatur zu Ende. Das Bild ist es wert, zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt wieder nominiert zu werden. --Hubertl 09:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ja, da habe ich geschlafen. Wie lange sollte man denn in der Regel warten, bevor man dasselbe Bild noch einmal vorschlägt? --Milseburg (talk) 12:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ehrlich gesagt, ich weiß es nicht. Aber zumindest 2 Monate würde ich warten, die Neukandidatur aber dann auch begründen. Sonst kommt einer und quäckt allen ins Ohr, dass das ja schon einmal kandidiert hat und es niemand bewerten wollte. --Hubertl 21:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Hubertl: Ich habe das Bild jetzt noch einmal überarbeitet, EXIF ergänzt usw. und eine neue Version hochgeladen. Wie nehme ich denn jetzt eine Neukandidatur vor? Wenn ich wie gewohnt über "Create new nomination" gehe und den Namen des Bildes einfüge, kommt die alte Nominierung zum Vorschein. Das kommt mir komisch vor und ich habe nicht weitergemacht. Hast du da einen Rat? --Milseburg (talk) 16:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Ich würde das Bild neu hochladen mit einem neuen Dateinamen (Version/Variante2), denn die Seite, auf der die Nominierung steht, bezieht sich immer auf den Dateinamen und ist deswegen gesperrt. In der Infozeile würde ich einen Hinweis auf die Altkandidatur geben und die Gründe für die Neukandidatur (bezogen auf die Kritik bei der ersten Kandidatur) geben. Ich muss gestehen, dass ich es selbst nie gemacht habe, aber es ist scheints die einzige mögliche Lösung. --Hubertl 17:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Hubertl:Ich stellte einen Löschantrag auf die alte Nominationpage. Das ging. Nun läuft die Neukandidatur. Deine aktuelle Nominierung ist in der Höhe beeindruckend, in der Breite mir aber zu ausschnitthaft. Daher meine Zurückhaltung. --Milseburg (talk) 08:53, 3 October 2016 (UTC) @Hubertl:? Nun läuft es noch bescheidener. --Milseburg (talk) 13:54, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Ich würde das Bild neu hochladen mit einem neuen Dateinamen (Version/Variante2), denn die Seite, auf der die Nominierung steht, bezieht sich immer auf den Dateinamen und ist deswegen gesperrt. In der Infozeile würde ich einen Hinweis auf die Altkandidatur geben und die Gründe für die Neukandidatur (bezogen auf die Kritik bei der ersten Kandidatur) geben. Ich muss gestehen, dass ich es selbst nie gemacht habe, aber es ist scheints die einzige mögliche Lösung. --Hubertl 17:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Hubertl: Ich habe das Bild jetzt noch einmal überarbeitet, EXIF ergänzt usw. und eine neue Version hochgeladen. Wie nehme ich denn jetzt eine Neukandidatur vor? Wenn ich wie gewohnt über "Create new nomination" gehe und den Namen des Bildes einfüge, kommt die alte Nominierung zum Vorschein. Das kommt mir komisch vor und ich habe nicht weitergemacht. Hast du da einen Rat? --Milseburg (talk) 16:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Ehrlich gesagt, ich weiß es nicht. Aber zumindest 2 Monate würde ich warten, die Neukandidatur aber dann auch begründen. Sonst kommt einer und quäckt allen ins Ohr, dass das ja schon einmal kandidiert hat und es niemand bewerten wollte. --Hubertl 21:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Eubeberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Eubeberg later.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Heimbergturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
_im_Winter_2016.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Pferdskopf (Rhön) im Winter 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Maulkuppe (Rhön).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Teufelstein (Berg in der Rhön).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Weiherberg von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Dunes of Amrum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dunes of Amrum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Weiherkuppe von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Weiherkuppe (Winter).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Stellberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Stellberg (Ostseite).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Weiherberg von Westen (Breitbild).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Gangolfskapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Milseburghütte (Winter).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Bubenbader Stein (Winter).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Bürgerturm Gotha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Views on Dalherdakuppe from restricted military area..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Color Profile[edit]
Es ist zwar kein Muß, aber ich finde es gut wenn Bilder ein color-profile haben, d.h. ein ICC profil (z.B. sRGB) ist in der Bilddatei eingebettet. Wenn man einen Monitor hat, der ein größeres Gamut als sRGB hat, würden Bilder ohne profil, die aber in sRGB sind, nicht mehr korrekt angezeigt (zu blass).Nachdem es immer mehr solche Monitore gibt, sollte man Farbprofile verwenden um eine Korrekte Anzeige zu garantieren.Siehe Kapitel Color space in Commons:Image_guidelines. Ich habe Photoshop so konfiguriert, dass ich gewarnt werde, wenn ich ein Bild ohne Profil aufmache, deshalb ist mir das Fehlen bei deinem Bild aufgefallen. --Rftblr (talk) 19:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Nebel fließt über die Rhön.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Panorama vom Bürgerturm Gotha.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Bürgerturm Gotha.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Abtsroder Kuppe von Süden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Abtrsoder Kuppe von Nordwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Nebel fließt über die Rhön.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nebel fließt über die Rhön.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama von Burg Windeck (Weinheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Panorama von Burg Windeck (Weinheim).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama von Burg Windeck (Weinheim).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Views from Ohlyturm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Stirnberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Arnsberg-Panorama Herbst 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Arnsberg-Panorama Herbst 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Arnsberg-Panorama Herbst 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama Suhlesturm.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Schafstein von Südosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Schafstein von Norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Schafstein von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Mengshäuser Kuppe mit Kruspis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, Jörg. I think this is a beautiful painterly landscape. Do you think of it as a deserving FP nominee? If you do, I'd be happy to nominate it; just let me know.
- All the best,
- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Ikan, many thanks for your attention. Feel free to nominate it. I like it too, but regarding Rimberg (Knuell) I´m not sure if my single shots are sharp enough. Best regards! --Milseburg (talk) 12:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- It's certainly possible that people won't consider the background as sharp as they'd like. I think it's a bit sharper than the Rimberg picture, though. But I don't really know unless I try. Your composition reminds me somewhat of paintings my father painted in New England in the late 1960s and early 70s. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- I still have 2 nominations on the board, so I'll wait and nominate this photo later. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- It's certainly possible that people won't consider the background as sharp as they'd like. I think it's a bit sharper than the Rimberg picture, though. But I don't really know unless I try. Your composition reminds me somewhat of paintings my father painted in New England in the late 1960s and early 70s. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Ikan, many thanks for your attention. Feel free to nominate it. I like it too, but regarding Rimberg (Knuell) I´m not sure if my single shots are sharp enough. Best regards! --Milseburg (talk) 12:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Heussner-Turm (W).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Stoppelsberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Heussner-Turm (NO).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Ofenbergturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth 2016[edit]
Hallo Milseburg,
Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.
Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.
Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.
Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,
--Blech (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.JPG) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Rimberg (Knuell).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Isthaberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Hexenbuche mit Kreuzberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.JPG) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Teufelstein (Felsen in der Rhön).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Blockmeer Schafstein Ost.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Blockmeer Schafstein Nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.JPG) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Ellenbogen (Rhön).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Klafferkessel vom Greifenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Milseburg (Südansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Milseburg bei Inversionswetterlage (Ausschnitt).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Buchschirm (Westseite).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Aussichtswarte Buchschirm.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Hexenbuche mit Kreuzberg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hexenbuche mit Kreuzberg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Wallenburger Turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Basaltsee Tintenfass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Basaltsee Tintenfass (Ufer).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
QI-Nominierung "Montaña del Selado - Caldera del Corazoncillo"[edit]
Hallo, vielen Dank für den Hinweis auf den stitching error in meiner QI-Nominierung. Habe es gestern Abend korrigiert. Würdest du bitte nochmal drüberschauen? Vielen Dank --Llez (talk) 10:56, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Danke für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Österreich[edit]
.svg){kind=logo}
Die Jury bewertet nun alle eingereichten Fotos. Die Preisträger geben wir am 31. Juli 2016 auf der Website wikilovesearth.at bekannt.
Bei dieser Gelegenheit möchte ich dich an die WikiCon 2016 Mitte September erinnern, für die noch bis 30. Juni Programmvorschläge eingereicht werden können. Wikimedia Österreich wird wieder Stipendien für die Teilnahme zur Verfügung stellen, genauere Infos veröffentlichen wir Ende Juni. Bei Fragen dazu kannst du dich gerne an uns wenden: verein@wikimedia.at. Liebe Grüße --Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) 13:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prinzenkopf (Nordansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Blockmeer Schafstein Nord.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blockmeer Schafstein Nord.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Stormbruch - Diemelsee - Eisenberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
_-_Zustieg_von_Osten.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Rockenstein (Rhön) - Zustieg von Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
_-_Gipfelkreuz_(Ostansicht).jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Rockenstein (Rhön) - Gipfelkreuz (Ostansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Rockenstein (Gipfelkreuz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Prinzenkopf (NNW).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Klafferkessel vom Greifenberg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Klafferkessel vom Greifenberg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Himmeldunkberg (Rockenstein).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Mehliskopfturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Mehliskopf-Thurm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Dreistelzberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Ofenbergturm 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Fünfseenblick - Spitzenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Spitzenstein (SO).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Spitzenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Telegrafie-Station Spitzenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Loreleyblick Maria Ruh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Ein Herzliches Dankeschön für Deinen WLE-Beitrag 2016[edit]
Hallo Milseburg,
der diesjährige Fotowettbewerb „Wiki Loves Earth“ liegt hinter uns. Für Deutschland haben mehr als 1100 Teilnehmer über 18.000 Fotos hochgeladen. Damit sind wir ein gutes Stück vorangekommen bei der Dokumentation der Schutzgebiete und zu schützenden Objekte unserer Natur.
Vorjury und Hauptjury haben eine Auslese nach qualitativen Kriterien vorgenommen und im Ergebnis wurden 100 Preisträger ermittelt. Die TOP-100-Fotos von 64 Fotografen findet Ihr auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.
Doch der gesamte Fotoschatz lässt sich mit nur 100 Fotos kaum erfassen. Daher habe ich nach Themenfeldern eine persönliche Auswahl vorgenommen und diese in Form von Kalenderpostern zusammengestellt. Über ein offizielles Poster mit den TOP-100 hinaus gibt es auch Poster zu Flora, Fauna, Landschaften und zur Geologie. Für jeden Geschmack dürfte bei dieser Kollektion etwas dabei sind. Wer Lust hat kann sich eine preisgünstige Druckerei suchen und ein solches Poster für ca. 15 € im Format A1 ausdrucken lassen. Alle fünf Poster zusammen zeigen mehr als 400 Fotos von über 160 Teilnehmern.
TOP-100
Landschaften
Fauna
Flora
Geologie
Wenn alles klappt, dann wird das TOP-100-Poster in Kürze auch in höherer Auflage gedruckt und auf der bevorstehenden WikiCon in der Region Stuttgart (Kornwestheim) für die Teilnehmer zum Mitnehmen und Weiterverteilen vorliegen. Auf dieser vom 16.-18. September stattfindenden Konferenz wollen wir auch nächste Schritte und mögliche Projekte mit Blick auf WLE-2017 diskutieren. Vorschläge für eine WLE-Preisverleihung und einen WLE-Workshop im Rahmen der WikiCon liegen auf dem Tisch. Es wäre schön, wenn auch Du dabei wärst.
Der Kalender reicht übrigens bis Juni 2017 und soll dazu einladen, schon in den kommenden Wochen und Monaten erneut auf Fototour rund um den Naturschutz zu gehen. Möge Euch ein Poster bis zum 4. WLE-Fotowettbewerb im Mai 2017 begleiten. Von mir allen Teilnehmern ein ganz persönliches Dankeschön und den Preisträgern einen herzlichen Glückwunsch. ( Bernd Gross, 20:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC))
Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Österreich: Gratulation![edit]
Platz 1
Du hast mit diesem Bild Platz 1 beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Österreich gewonnen. Alle Preisträger werden im Lauf des 31. Juli unter anderem auf wikilovesearth.at veröffentlicht. Ich werde dich bezüglich deines Preises noch per Wikimail kontaktieren. Uns erreichst du unter kontakt
wikilovesearth.at.
Herzlichen Glückwunsch im Namen des Organisationsteams! --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 22:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Galgenturm (Mastershausen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Galgenturm Mastershausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland[edit]
Hallo Milseburg!
Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.
Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.
Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.
Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Via Regia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Aussichtspunkt Via Regia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Burg Münzenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Rößberg (Großenbach).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Leuchtturm Pellworm 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Sankt Salvator (Pellworm).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Burg Pfalzgrafenstein (Blücherblick).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Leuchtturm Falshöft.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Windmühle Amanda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Burg Sterrenberg (Südostansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Burg Münzenberg (Nordwestansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Burg Münzenberg (Westansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Panorama vom Aussichtspunkt Via Regia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Aussichtspunkt Via Regia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Leuchtturm Falshöft NW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama von der Milseburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland![edit]
.svg){kind=logo}
Hallo Milseburg!
Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!
Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.
An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.
Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die
Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.
(DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Marksburg 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama Burg Lindelbrunn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Hainig (Lauterbach).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Rimberg-Panorama 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rimberg-Panorama 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Rimberg-Panorama 2014 (Basic Version).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Herbst im Sauerland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Loreleyblick Maria Ruh (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Spitzenstein (Burg Schönburg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Review of Image:San Sebastian Panorama Igeldo 001.jpg[edit]
Hi, thanks for your QI review comments for my image Image:San Sebastian Panorama Igeldo 001.jpg. You mentioned raising the right part of the panorama a bit more. I have now done that and uploaded the new version, but was a little bit late because the older version of the image had already been promoted. Do you know if I have to renominate the new version of the image? Spike (talk) 22:30, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hi @Spike:, sorry for my late answer. I was on the road and offline. Your image is now even better. In any case, the QI-status is justified. A new nomination is not necessary. If you want to check the horizontal orientation of panoramas, I recommend this website: http://www.udeuschle.selfhost.pro/panoramas/makepanoramas_en.htm --Milseburg (talk) 11:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks again, especially for that panorama horizon tool. This is brilliant. I was asking myself "how can he be so sure that the horizon is tilted, I don't see it". Then I looked for myself using Google Earth, but that was painfully complicated. This, however, is super-convenient. Spike (talk) 20:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Herbst im Sauerland.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Herbst im Sauerland.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland[edit]
.svg){kind=logo}
Hallo,
hiermit möchte ich Dir im Namen der Jury zu Deiner erfolgreichen Teilnahme am diesjährigen Denkmal-Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments in Deutschland ganz herzlich gratulieren.
Insgesamt wurden in diesem Jahr rund 39.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen hochgeladen und für die Bebilderung von Artikeln und Listen in der Wikipedia zur Verfügung gestellt. Aus dieser großen Zahl heraus erreichte Dein nebenstehendes tolles Foto einen Platz unter den Top 100 – ein Erfolg, der dementsprechend hoch einzuschätzen ist.
Als Preis erhältst Du einen Foto- oder Buchgutschein im Wert von 20 Euro. Daher bitten wir Dich, eine E-Mail an communitywikimedia.de zu schicken, in der Du Deinen Benutzernamen und Deinen Klarnamen angibst. Gibt dort bitte auch an, ob du lieber einen Foto- oder lieber einen Buchgutschein per E-Mail zugeschickt bekommen möchtest.
Die 100 Bilder aller Preisträgerinnen und Preisträger kannst Du Dir hier anschauen.
Ich hoffe, dass der Wettbewerb Dir mindestens ebenso viel Freude bereitet hat wie uns. Auf ein Wiedersehen im Jahr 2017!
i. A. --Nicola (talk) 07:20, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Loreleyblick Maria Ruh (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Loreleyblick Maria Ruh (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Prinzenkopfturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Leuchtturm Pellworm (Hochformat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Hausbergturm 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Bell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Otto-Andreas-Turm (Westansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer[edit]
Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.
Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Panorama vom Prinzenkopfturm.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Prinzenkopfturm.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Kreuzbergkapelle (Altastenberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Sankt Erasmus Altastenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Maria Schnee (Altastenberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Altastenberg-Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Schesaplanahütte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama von Maleens Knoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Maleens Knoll 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Aussichtspunkt Strandweg (Sankt Peter-Ording).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Fünfseenblick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Rubjerg Knude Fyr 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Hirtshals Fyr 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Grüner Turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Schombergturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Hirtshals Fyr 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hirtshals Fyr 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Mont Blanc from the Vosges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Belchen (Hohe Möhr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Gipfelkreuz Pinneberg (Helgoland).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Pinneberg (Helgoland).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Remote views of Mont Blanc seen from the Thanner Hubel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
_2.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Pinneberg (Helgoland) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Rockenstein (Rhön).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Helgolandpanorama vom Pinneberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama from Milseburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Stoffelskuppe und Pleß.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Ausblick von Burg Liebenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth 2017[edit]
Hallo Milseburg,
bald startet wieder Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland, unser Fotowettbewerb rund um das Themengebiet Naturschutz. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du wieder mitmachst.
Bilder können vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2017 eingereicht werden.
WLE Deutschland kooperiert dieses Jahr mit der Deutschen UNESCO-Kommission (DUK). Die bestplatzierten Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten, Weltnaturerbe und UNESCO-Geoparks sollen auf http://www.unesco.de präsentiert werden.
Die allgemeinen Wünsche der Organisatoren haben sich nicht geändert: Schutzgebiet oder -objekt angeben, Originalauflösung, keine Signaturen oder ähnliches im Bild.
Die Suche nach geeigneten Motiven erleichtern unter anderem neue Listen aller deutschen Naturwaldreservate oder Listen der Naturdenkmale in Baden-Württemberg, im Saarland, Hessen und Brandenburg. Stöbere einfach mal bei Wikipedia, z. B. auf der Karte.
Eine Vorjury wird die Vorauswahl der Bilder übernehmen. Hier kannst Du Dich ebenfalls gerne beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Hallgarter Zange (Turm).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Lemberg (Schwäbische Alb) 360°.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lemberg (Schwäbische Alb) 360°.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! 360° Helfenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Aussicht Sohlhöhe (Spessart).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Loreley von Nordwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
-Panorama_2016.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Hausberg (Taunus)-Panorama 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Hausberg (Taunus)-Panorama 2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hausberg (Taunus)-Panorama 2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Ludwig-Keller-Turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
----QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Ausblick Bubenbader Stein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Bubenbad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Soisberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Aussicht Kleiner Gleichberg Süd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Aussicht Kleiner Gleichberg Nordost.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Bubenbader Stein[edit]
Tach! Etwa einmal jährlich schaue ich ja mal bei FPC vorbei, ob sich auch mal wieder ein gutes Bild dahin verirrt hat, und da hat mich dein Ausblick vom Bubenbader Stein angelacht, zumal ich die Rhön persönlich ja auch sehr schätze. Ich finde das Bild aber etwas düster und trübe in der Stimmung. Mit etwas Kurvenbiegen, ein klein wenig mehr Rot (gegen die Farbkühle) und behutsamem Tonemapping kommt das hier raus. Gefällt mir besser. Kann natürlich auch an meinem Monitor liegen :-) Bei Panoramen empfehle ich, auch die Vorlage {{Panorama}} einzusetzen:
|
NOTE: This image is a panorama of Bubenbader Stein consisting of 350 frames that were merged or stitched in Traumsoftware. As a result, this image necessarily underwent some form of digital manipulation. These manipulations may include blending, blurring, cloning, and color and perspective adjustments. As a result of these adjustments, the image content may be slightly different than reality at the points where multiple images were combined. This manipulation is often required due to lens, perspective, and parallax distortions.
|
--Kreuzschnabel 10:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hallo Kreuzschnabel, danke fürs Feedback. Der Bubenbader Stein ist ein schöner Gipfel und im Gegensatz zur benachbarten Milseburg nicht überlaufen - eher ein Geheimtipp und nur auf Schleichwegen zu erreichen. Ich wollte eigentlich nur die Aussicht fotografieren. Um Gegenlicht zu vermeiden, bin ich morgens hinauf, wenn die Sonne noch links außerhalb des Blickfeldes steht. Leider war es recht diesig, sodass ich mich kurzfristig entschloss, die Felsen mit ins Bild einzubeziehen. Diese lagen anfangs noch größtenteils im Schatten. Der Vordergrund war zu dunkel. Mit mehr Sonne kam etwas später dann auch Gegenlichproblematik ins Spiel. Ausgefressene Wolken über der Wasserkuppe drohten. Da habe ich eine Balance gesucht. Auf die Farben habe ich da gar nicht geachtet. Deine Überarbeitung wirkt farbenfroher und frischer. Es würde mich schon interessieren, mit welchem Programm du da an welchen Reglern gedreht hast. Ich habe mir nur nur PhotoShop Elements 7.0 vor Jahren mal gekauft. Da Farben oft Geschmackssache und teilw. monitorabhängig sind, habe ich mit Tonemapping und Kurven kaum gearbeitet und keine Kenntnisse. Es wäre hier für FPC sicherlich von Nutzen. Ob es alle Kritiker überzeugt, weiß ich nicht. Die Panoramavorlage kenne ich, nur vergesse ich sie oft. Es hat auch bisher noch niemand danach gefragt. Auf dem Bubenbader Stein war ich sicher nicht zum letzten Mal. Bei besserer Sicht und/oder hohem Sonnenstand werde ich es nochmal probieren. lG --Milseburg (talk) 12:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Software ist GIMP, das Tonemapping gibt’s als Plugin („Advanced Tone Mapping“). Alles kostenlos und frei :-) Aber einen halbwegs kalibrierten oder kalibrierbaren Monitor braucht man schon dafür, und die gibt’s nicht für 120 Euro, zumindest nicht neu. Ich hab mir vor Jahren mal zwei gebrauchte HP LP2465 gekauft (für etwa den Stückpreis) und bin damit immer noch sehr zufrieden. --Kreuzschnabel 17:40, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Vielleicht noch die Notiz für die Dammersfeldkuppe etwas höher schieben, damit man nicht die Gr. Nalle dafür hält ;-) --Kreuzschnabel 17:43, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Rauher Kulm von Nordwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Simmelsberg im Spätherbst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth 2017 - Danke, und wie geht es weiter?[edit]
Hallo Milseburg,
vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland. Damit hast Du ein Stück Natur in Deiner Region dokumentiert und Wikipedia geholfen, andere darüber zu informieren.
Dieses Jahr wurden 24.000 Fotos eingereicht, im vorigen Jahr waren es noch 18.000. Bei der Teilnehmerzahl (1063) wurde der Rekord vom Vorjahr nur knapp verpasst.
Um die große Zahl von Bildern angemessen zu bewältigen, suchen wir weitere Helfer für die Vorjury, zum Kategorisieren oder zum Einfügen der Bilder in die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia.
Eine Jury wird Anfang Juli auf einer Sitzung in Fulda die besten Bilder auswählen. Nach dem Zeitplan sollen die Top100 am 15. Juli 2017 veröffentlicht werden. Kurz danach werden die Gewinner benachrichtigt.
Wir möchten auf Wiki Loves Earth Biosphere Reserves hinweisen. Bei diesem Wettbewerb können bis Ende Juni Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten aus aller Welt eingereicht werden. Selbstverständlich darf man das ganze Jahr über Bilder zu beliebigen Themen bei Wikimedia Commons hochladen, nicht nur wenn ein Wettbewerb läuft...
Freundliche Grüße.
--Blech (talk) 21:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
The image File:Panorama vom Simmelsberg im Winter.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Simmelsberg im Winter.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! 360° vom Schesaplana-Massiv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Röti (Weissenstein).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Röti von der Hasenmatt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Aussicht Kleiner Gleichberg Süd.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aussicht Kleiner Gleichberg Süd.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:360° vom Schesaplana-Massiv.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° vom Schesaplana-Massiv.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Schesaplana von der Mannheimer Hütte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Hasenmatt von der Röti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Schesaplana - Blick nach Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Schesaplana - Tiefblick Brandnertal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Ausblick vom Gipfel der Kösseine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Bollerbergtürme 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Bollerberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Bollerberg von Süden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Uwe-Düne (Nordansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Uwe-Düne (Ostansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Stirnberg - Ausblick vom Nordwesthang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
WLE 2017 - Top100[edit]
Hallo Milseburg,
beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland hat die Jury eines Deiner Bilder unter die Top100 gewählt. Du findest sie auf der Seite https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wiki_Loves_Earth_2017/Deutschland/Top100
Die Organisatoren bedanken sich nochmals und gratulieren herzlich,
--Blech (talk) 16:30, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Sauerland-Stabil-Stuhl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Quermarkenfeuer Rotes Kliff.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Stirnberg - Ausblick vom Nordwesthang.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stirnberg - Ausblick vom Nordwesthang.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Winter auf dem Heidelstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Heldrastein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Heldrastein (Felswand).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Heldrastein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Kirche (Bad Orb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Ehemalige Synagoge Bad Orb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Steinwand von Südosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Views from Heldrastein.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Erbeskopfturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Eubeberg von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Brandner Gletscher 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Brandner Gletscherrandsee mit Schesaplana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Panorama vom Heldrastein.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Heldrastein.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Burg Gutenfels (Kaub).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Burg Pfalzgrafenstein 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Windmühle Charlotte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Leuchtturm Falshöft 2017 HF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Leuchtturm Falshöft 2017 QF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Brandner Gletscherrandsee mit Schesaplana.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brandner Gletscherrandsee mit Schesaplana.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! 360° Panorama vom Hochgolling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Leuchtturm Böhl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 22:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Obertorturm (Bad Orb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
_Nordostansicht.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Sankt Martin (Bad Orb) Nordostansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
_S%C3%BCdostansicht.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Sankt Martin (Bad Orb) Südostansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:360° Panorama vom Hochgolling.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Panorama vom Hochgolling.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Gradierwerk (Bad Orb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Patrizierhaus Nr. 30 (Bad Orb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Gradierwerk Bad Orb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ellenbogen (Rhön), Eisenacher Haus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
_2017.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Ellenbogen (Rhön) 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Noahs Segel 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Noahs Segel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Nebelmeer nördlich der Milseburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Antennenanlage Schnitzersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland![edit]
Hallo Milseburg!
Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über mehr als 20.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!
Du hast noch bis zum 15. Oktober die Gelegenheit, Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu sichten und zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst, die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Gern kannst Du auch deine und andere Bilder in Wikipedia einbinden.
Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.
(Martin Rulsch (WMDE) im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 9. Oktober 2017)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama von Langscheid am Sorpesee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Erbeskopf aus Nordnordwest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Nebelmeer nördlich der Milseburg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nebelmeer nördlich der Milseburg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
The image File:Piz Grisch Panorama beschriftet.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Piz Grisch Panorama beschriftet.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]
Hi Milseburg, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:
- Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
- Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
- Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
--Hystrix (talk) 16:28, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Neue Bamberger Hütte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Arnsberg-Neustadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Markkirchl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Danke für die Teilnahme bei WikiDaheim 2017 in Österreich![edit]
.svg)
Hallo Milseburg!
Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 7.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Ort in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinem möglich war.
Die 561 besten Bilder wurden in den letzten Wochen von einer Vorjury ausgesucht, die Du dir hier anschauen kannst - vielleicht sind auch Bilder von Dir dabei! :-) Eine Jury wird nun bis Mitte November die zehn besten Bilder aussuchen, die Preisträger werden danach von uns verständigt.
Nochmals vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikimedia-Projekte bebilderst! Im 2. Halbjahr 2018 wird WikiDaheim wahrscheinlich wieder stattfinden - wir würden uns freuen, wenn du dann wieder dabei wärst :-) Solltest Du Fragen haben, so kannst Du Dich gerne an wikidaheimwikimedia.at wenden.
(Braveheart für das Team von WikiDaheim, 11:47, 2. Nov 2017 (UTC))
Herzlichen Glückwunsch zu Platz 9 beim Fotowettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2017![edit]
Hallo Jörg!
Du hast mit File:360° Panorama vom Hochgolling.jpg Platz 9 beim Fottowettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2017 belegt. Du wirst bezüglich des Preises noch extra von Wikimedia Österreich verständigt. Herzlichen Glückwunsch! LG, Braveheart (talk) 21:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Glockenturm (Arnsberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
QIC Seceda-Panorama[edit]
Hallo Milseburg, vielen Dank für die Revision des [Seceda-Panoramas]. Die Stitchingfehler hatte ich ja schon behoben und Dir dann auf der File talk-Seite auch geantwortet und auch gefragt, wie man so ein berechnetes Panorama ersellt. Leider ist seitdem Funkstille. Ich weiß also nicht, was ich am Panorama noch ändern soll, damit es promoted wird. Bitte um kurze Info auf der File-talk-Seite. Gruß --Llez (talk) 23:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Ich hatte dir auf File talk:Seceda - Panorama S-W-N-E.jpg bereits geantwortet. --Milseburg (talk) 11:50, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank. Das war ja gerade die Krux: MIt Hugin kann man den zwar den Horizont ausgleichen, aber er macht zu viele Stitchingfehler. Lightroom/Photoshop stitchen zwar nahezu perfekt, aber kaum ein Chance, den Horizot auszugleichen. Einen Tod muss man wohl sterben. Und auch noch danke für den Hinweis zum berechneten Panorama. Gruß --Llez (talk) 12:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Glockenturm (Soester Straße).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Alter Markt Arnsberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Salzachgeier von Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Kröndlhorn von Südwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Westlicher Salzachgeier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Schafsiedel vom Kröndlhorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Haberstein - Kösseine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Question This image was promoted by Fambenhorst 6 days ago and is still here? ----QICbot (talk) 05:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Aussichtsturm Hattgenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Hattgenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Ausblick vom Gipfel der Kösseine.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ausblick vom Gipfel der Kösseine.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
_2017.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Rockenstein (Rhön) 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
_2017.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Himmeldunkberg (Rockenstein) 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Herzlichen Glückwunsch![edit]
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Kreuzberg-Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Kreuzberg-Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kreuzberg-Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama Siebenburgenblick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Platte-Steinwald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Panorama Siebenburgenblick.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama Siebenburgenblick.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Riesenbühl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Bollerberg-Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Heidekopf-Panorama 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Sauerland Stabil-Stuhl 360°.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brandner Glacier seen from Schesaplana summit in 2016.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Helgoland von See.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Wachtküppel (Nordwestansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Kreuzberg (Rhön).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Wachtküppel (Nordwestansicht).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wachtküppel (Nordwestansicht).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
[edit]
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
[edit]
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Done --Milseburg (talk) 09:07, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kreuzberg seen from southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Wiki Loves Earth 2018[edit]
Hallo Milseburg,
vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2018 können beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland wieder Landschafts- und Naturfotos eingereicht werden. Sie sollen in Schutzgebieten aufgenommen worden sein. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch dieses Jahr mitmachst.
Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen, als Einstiegsseite kann diese Karte dienen.
Als ehemaliger Teilnehmer kannst Du bis Ende April bei der Wahl der Jury abstimmen.
Da viele tausend Bilder zu bewerten sind, wird die sogenannte Vorjury ab Anfang Mai eine Vorauswahl der eingereichten Bilder übernehmen. Deine Beteiligung daran ist ausdrücklich erwünscht. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt dann per E-Mail.
Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Galgenturm (Mellrichstadt).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama von der Hohen Geba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama Morsum-Kliff 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama Morsum-Kliff 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama Morsum-Kliff 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama Ellenbogen (Sylt).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Listland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Hörnum Odde vom Leuchtturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Views of Fuldaer Haus on Maulkuppe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Pferdskopf (Rhön).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Weiherberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Taunus bei Wehrheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama auf dem Roten Kliff.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vor dem Roten Kliff.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Panorama auf dem Roten Kliff.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama auf dem Roten Kliff.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Wasserkuppe vom Weiherberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Wachtküppel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Erbeskopf von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Großen Leuchtberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 08:19, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Ausblick vom Steilufer Schönhagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama Katinger Watt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Aussicht vom Spitznack.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Hattgenstein - Rothenburgberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Aussicht von der Wegelnburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Hexenbuche auf dem Himmeldunkberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Panorama vom Pferdskopf (Rhön).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Pferdskopf (Rhön).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Erbeskopfturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Panorama vom Wachtküppel.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Wachtküppel.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Panorama vom Großen Leuchtberg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Großen Leuchtberg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Erbeskopfturm 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Tristkopf (Kitzbüheler Alpen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Tristkopfgipfel (Kitzbüheler Alpen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
_von_Norden.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Fellhorn (Chiemgauer Alpen) von Norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Wegkreuz bei Weibersbrunn mit Geiersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Weibersbrunn mit Geiersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Fellhorn (Chiemgauer Alpen) von Norden.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fellhorn (Chiemgauer Alpen) von Norden.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Melibokus von Schloss Auerbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Hoherodskopf von Südwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
_von_Westen.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Bilstein (Vogelsberg) von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Melibokus von Zwingenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Overall view of Steinküppel (Wildflecken).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Panorama vom Tristkopf (Kitzbüheler Alpen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Felsberg von Südwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Krehberg von Nordwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Steinküppelgipfel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
The image File:Panorama vom Tristkopf (Kitzbüheler Alpen).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Tristkopf (Kitzbüheler Alpen).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth 2018[edit]
Hallo Milseburg,
im Namen von Organisationsteam und Jury danke ich Dir für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland.
Im Jahr 2018 wurden ebenso wie im Vorjahr etwa 24.000 Fotos hochgeladen, von denen viele die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia illustrieren werden. Die Teilnehmerzahl lag diesmal bei 683, im Vorjahr waren es 1063.
Unsere Jury hat die Top100 der Bilder aus Deutschland ausgewählt. Die zehn bestplatzierten Fotos nehmen an der internationalen Ausscheidung teil.
Falls Du Lust auf einen weiteren Fotowettbewerb hast: Im September läuft Wiki Loves Monuments, wo Bilder von denkmalgeschützten Gebäuden eingereicht werden können.
Freundliche Grüße.
--Blech (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Burg Gleiberg von Nordwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Burg Gleiberg von Süden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Burg Gleiberg - Merenberger Bau und Bergfried.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
-Panorama.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_360%C2%B0.jpg){kind=link}
-Panorama_2016.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_von_Norden.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}