Commons talk:Reusing content outside Wikimedia
- See also m:Meta:Babel/Archives/2008-12#Proposal_to_disable_hotlinking; Add this at Commons, Problems using pictures from Commons in Blogger - making it more of a stock photo repository (August 2010)
![]() | |
---|---|
| |
Contents
- 1 Embedding-Tool for reuse outside Wikip/media ??
- 2 Clarifying authorship
- 3 Radical rewrite
- 4 Getting content into WikiMedia
- 5 CJEU: Under EU law, you are not liable for embedding or framing a video or image from another website
- 6 sound system
- 7 Report abuse
- 8 embedr.eu
- 9 To Take Coppy of!
- 10 Minor Edit Needed for Good English
- 11 Thick Cartoon network ticgk barbi
- 12 Uyatt jdsjdy kegsus
- 13 mention API:Imageinfo
- 14 გიგა კოპაძე
- 15 Replace period (".") with a comma (",")
- 16 COM:REUSE#Hotlinking or InstantCommons
Embedding-Tool for reuse outside Wikip/media ??[edit]
Is there an easy-to-use tool to generate a HTML-snippet incl. License that can be embedded into a webpage !? In Germany users are pursued for copyright infringment because they dont know how to use licenses correctly. An easy-to-use embedding function along the lines of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Attribution_Generator would be very helpful ?? Dostl ba (talk) 13:40, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Clarifying authorship[edit]
I just got credited on IT World for a Wikipedia image. Unfortunately, I am not the author of the image, just the person who uploaded it, after obtaining permission. I think this guideline ought to make clear the difference between uploaders and authors, and how to find the later. Also in the section on getting further permission, there ought to be a mention that files which were obtained from other sites, such as Flickr, typically have a link to the source. --agr (talk) 15:12, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Radical rewrite[edit]
Radical rewrite today, to focus on the needs of reusers and try for much greater clarity: before and after. Some material moved to Commons:Enforcing license terms, some to Commons:Reusing content outside Wikimedia/technical, some to Commons:Reusing content outside Wikimedia/licenses. Rd232 (talk) 23:57, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
I would like to change the following sentence in the lead
- from: Content in the public domain has no legal requirement of attribution at all.
- to__: Content in the public domain has no strict legal requirement of attribution.
as, though it may legally not necessary to credit the author, it is ethically appropriate to do so.
In addition, I am not totally sure that outside of the US it is really legal/o.k. not to credit/mention the creator (if known) of a work considered to be or given into the public domain. I think that this might not be legal in Germany due to the strong bond between the work and its creator in the copyright law of Germany. --Túrelio (talk) 13:33, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- I was actually thinking something similar. How about
- Content in the public domain may not have a strict legal requirement of attribution (depending on the jurisdiction of content reuse), but for ethical reasons attribution is recommended.
- Rd232 (talk) 13:37, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Getting content into WikiMedia[edit]
Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask, but i can't seem to find a better forum for the question: Is there a way for me, as an editor to request permission from a graphic license holder, and then load that permission and graphic into OTRS/WikiCommons, or does the whole process need to be initiated by the license holder? BeadleB (talk) 01:39, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
CJEU: Under EU law, you are not liable for embedding or framing a video or image from another website[edit]
If the latter is accessible to the general public.
If and to the extent that this work is freely accessible on the website to which the internet link points, the assumption must be made that the holders of the copyright have, when they permitted this communication, considered all internet users as the public.
Quoted from [1]. Not that we're going to embed YouTube videos, but nice to know. --Nemo 10:56, 22 November 2014 (UTC) is original Karmus interresting? I dont know if its zwittert
I need free browsing, help me pls , my number is 2349021980831 Ogbadu ibeh shem (talk) 08:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
sound system[edit]
need to update sound system —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 108.36.162.4 (talk) 15:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Heading text[edit]
Report abuse[edit]
Where can I report abuse? The page (lol.lynx.)net.ru hosts a full copy of commons.wikimedia.org without proper attribution or licensing, even scamming the links looking like our original site: [2] + [3] for example... even the login page: http://lol.lynx.net.ru/index.php?q=uggcf%3A%2F%2Fpbzzbaf.jvxvzrqvn.bet%2Fj%2Fvaqrk.cuc%3Fgvgyr%3DFcrpvny%3AHfreYbtva%26nzc%3Bergheagb%3DZnva%2BCntr ! --.js (((☎))) 09:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for notifying. Hmm, this should probably reported directly to WMF. --Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
embedr.eu[edit]
Europeana is investing on http://embedr.eu/ , see also [4]. Nemo 12:58, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
To Take Coppy of![edit]
If I like some wards, do I get a coppy? Please, Tunminn Phuwai (talk) 12:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Minor Edit Needed for Good English[edit]
{{edit request}} The article includes the phrase "On Wikimedia Commons are almost all images and other media under some kind of free license" which is not good English. The word "are" needs to be moved, or the sentence needs to be rewritten. It should say "On Wikimedia Commons almost all images and other media are under some kind of free license". Alternatively "Almost all images and other media on Wikimedia Commons are under some kind of free license" would also work and I would prefer it, but either way. Thanks. LacrimosaDiesIlla (talk) 14:27, 28 August 2017 (UTC Haulweli sadfi ([[m.cartoonnetwork.com/Steven_Universe
On Wikimedia Commons nearly all images and media hold some type of free license.
Mollysdad1979 (talk) 04:04, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Thick Cartoon network ticgk barbi[edit]
What is bab you nam the fwaolwd world arez Tasedglop dafrt skan Kliosizmo (talk) 21:51, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Uyatt jdsjdy kegsus[edit]
{d}} Good eyes! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
(m.cartoonnetwork.com/steve_universe) Kliosizmo (talk) 22:00, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
mention API:Imageinfo[edit]
Possibility to automatically build credit is not mentioned here and it may be useful when reusing many images and being unable to provide credit by linking to commons
it turns out that API:Imageinfo does offer image license info with iiprop=extmetadata, e.g.
File:Gull portrait ca usa.jpg: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&titles=File:Gull%20portrait%20ca%20usa.jpg&prop=imageinfo&iiprop=metadata%7Ccommonmetadata%7Cextmetadata - AttributionRequired and Credit entries are especially useful, so it may be worth mentioning them
Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 14:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
გიგა კოპაძე[edit]
გიგა გიგა კოპაძე (talk) 14:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Replace period (".") with a comma (",")[edit]
Please replace the period after the phrase "and finally" in THE HEREIN PROJECT PAGE.
It is not grammatically correct to have a period there, and makes reading confusing.
Either replace the period with a comma, or remove the period altogether.
Mercy11 (talk) 03:10, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
COM:REUSE#Hotlinking or InstantCommons[edit]
{{editprotected}} Commons:Overwriting existing files has a link to the anchor COM:REUSE#Hotlinking or InstantCommons which doesn't work and needs to be inserted in this page. Besides this, please consider whether it is really (or still) necessary to block edits on the page to autoconfirmed users? Thanks, Hamilton Abreu (talk) 12:33, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Done Thanks Hamilton Abreu for the report. I have fixed the link. Unsure about the page protection. Raymond 13:07, 5 May 2018 (UTC)